Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Paul Krugman: In Defense of Obama (Rolling Stone) [View all]zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)12. Really poor defense from the left
He does a fair enough job defending Obama from the right critique. But from the left, his defense lies somewhere between "it coulda been worse, but he failed at his efforts" to "it's the best that could have been done" without really establishing it.
Furthermore, he came perilously close to doing terrible things to the U.S. safety net in pursuit of a budget Grand Bargain; we were saved from significant cuts to Social Security and a rise in the Medicare age only by Republican greed, the GOP's unwillingness to make even token concessions.
It's true that the Affordable Care Act will still leave millions of people in America uninsured. For one thing, it was never intended to cover undocumented immigrants, who are counted in standard measures of the uninsured. Furthermore, millions of low-income Americans will slip into the loophole Roberts created: They were supposed to be covered by a federally funded expansion of Medicaid, but some states are blocking that expansion out of sheer spite. Finally, unlike Social Security and Medicare, for which almost everyone is automatically eligible, Obamacare requires beneficiaries to prove their eligibility for Medicaid or choose and then pay for a subsidized private plan. Inevitably, some people will fall through the cracks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
While I disagree with the President on a few things, I've also been stunned by his low ratings.
Vinca
Oct 2014
#9
Right after Obama scored a victory with a second term the media acted like he was a lame duck.
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2014
#11
I suppose that if you are losing your house or already lost it, voting is not a big priority.
JDPriestly
Oct 2014
#43
I will acknowledge what Krugman says, but what he didn't say was Obama is owned by the
Dustlawyer
Oct 2014
#15
I blame the President for what he did and dint do, and I am in a position to know what went down.
Dustlawyer
Oct 2014
#37
Thanks. I believe both Elizabeth Warren and Bernie understand the reason for the attacks and don't
Dustlawyer
Oct 2014
#41
True, but the President's under the radar reforms include trucks, buses, and SUV's.
sorechasm
Oct 2014
#30