Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. K&R.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 01:06 PM
Oct 2014

I agree 98% with Krugman (but I still reserve my right to grouse and to push for improvement).

But I disagree on one thing. He said:

Let's be clear: The financial crisis should have been followed by a drastic crackdown on Wall Street abuses, and it wasn't. No important figures have gone to jail; bad banks and other financial institutions, from Citigroup to Goldman, were bailed out with few strings attached; and there has been nothing like the wholesale restructuring and reining in of finance that took place in the 1930s. Obama bears a considerable part of the blame for this disappointing response. It was his Treasury secretary and his attorney general who chose to treat finance with kid gloves.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/in-defense-of-obama-20141008#ixzz3FYzM1bj0

Krugman sits in an ivory tower at a university. He doesn't see what I see down here in reality. The distress of families who lost their homes. A couple who once had a thriving business, the big house, the good life reduced to living in one room and renting the rest through no fault of their own. The divorces. The children emotionally scarred and unable to do perform well in school. Elderly people who thought they had saved enough to supplement Social Security and who never recovered the money or homes they lost. Men and women in their 50s and 60s who lost their jobs and will never be able to save for retirement because when they work, they just don't earn what they did at one time. Young people who bet their lives on education and are now saddled with student loans they can't repay on the earnings from their minimum wage jobs.

As Krugman says, things are much better than they might have been. Obama deserves a lot of the credit for that. It is, however, just wrong that the very executives -- whose actions or inaction, caused the pain of so many Americans -- have profited so much in the aftermath of the economic crisis have not had to pay for their crimes, their violations of law, their fraud. They enjoy fantastic wealth while millions of innocent Americans have lost so much. That is not just a little unfair. That is an insult to the idea of justice.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He really has been out of sync BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #1
One to read and bookmark flpoljunkie Oct 2014 #2
Indeed it is! YoungDemCA Oct 2014 #3
Also: Everyone do yourself a favor and don't read the comments section YoungDemCA Oct 2014 #4
Or, better yet, leave a comment. pamela Oct 2014 #6
THIS^^^^^^^^^^^ calimary Oct 2014 #7
Some are even paid to post to simulate popular support for the Right. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #10
you've got a good idea for a reply right in your post, too BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #23
Paul Krugman liberal from boston Oct 2014 #13
so maybe our drift at times.... ensemble Oct 2014 #32
Krugman criticized Obama from the left geek tragedy Oct 2014 #5
"it took him years to start dealing with that opposition realistically"... sendero Oct 2014 #8
+1 hifiguy Oct 2014 #18
While I disagree with the President on a few things, I've also been stunned by his low ratings. Vinca Oct 2014 #9
I think it's entirely media saturation...loud simple minded garbage, BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #24
It is not so surprising Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #33
Right after Obama scored a victory with a second term the media acted like he was a lame duck. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #11
Really poor defense from the left zipplewrath Oct 2014 #12
K&R. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #14
That is true... but Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #34
I suppose that if you are losing your house or already lost it, voting is not a big priority. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #43
I will acknowledge what Krugman says, but what he didn't say was Obama is owned by the Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #15
Please check yourself Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #35
I blame the President for what he did and dint do, and I am in a position to know what went down. Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #37
I am not putting you down Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #38
I am not attacking you either, however I disagree with you on two things. Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #39
Best step forward Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #40
Thanks. I believe both Elizabeth Warren and Bernie understand the reason for the attacks and don't Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #41
I hear you Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #42
Krugman nails it... again. nt stevenleser Oct 2014 #16
Kick. Withholding criticism til after the elections grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #17
I have alwasy respected Krugman's opinion. Thanks for posting this. Hekate Oct 2014 #19
Thanks! n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #20
K&R. Good article. DanTex Oct 2014 #21
I appreciate Krugman's defense of PBO navarth Oct 2014 #22
Krugman gets it... Spazito Oct 2014 #25
k&r Electric Monk Oct 2014 #26
Kick! thanks YDCA Cha Oct 2014 #27
This Seems About Right -- On Several Fronts DallasNE Oct 2014 #28
I think most of the article is well done dsc Oct 2014 #29
True, but the President's under the radar reforms include trucks, buses, and SUV's. sorechasm Oct 2014 #30
I am not saying Obama didn't do more than all the rest of them dsc Oct 2014 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Krugman: In Defense ...»Reply #14