Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: RIP, Excalibur [View all]Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)30. TIME has an article out today: Can Dogs (And Other Animals) Get Ebola?
http://time.com/3480961/ebola-animals-transmission/
(snip)
To date, there is no documented case of Ebola spreading to people from dogs or dogs to people, and only one study, carried out by the CDC, looks at whether dogs can get Ebola at all. This research into the prevalence of Ebola-virus antibodies in dogs from regions of Gabon affected by the 20012002 outbreak showed that dogs can be infected by Ebola virus but exhibit no symptoms and the infection eventually clears.
The researchers concluded that dogs could be a potential source of human Ebola outbreaks and of virus spread during human outbreaks, but they did not test their hypothesis that human infection could occur through licking, biting or grooming. Instead, the study assumed dogs would transmit the infection in the same way as other animals observed in experiments; those animals excreted viral particles (in saliva, urine, feces) for a short period before the virus was cleared. David Moore, an expert in infectious diseases from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that since no dogs showed symptoms of the Ebola virus there is absolutely no evidence to support a role for dogs in transmission.
The study also suggests that differences in behavior and diet of pet dogs may alter risks in Ebola transmission. Whereas most dogs in Western Europe are fed dog food, many of the dogs studied in Gabon scavenged for their food, eating small dead animals that could have exposed them to the virus.
(snip)
To date, there is no documented case of Ebola spreading to people from dogs or dogs to people, and only one study, carried out by the CDC, looks at whether dogs can get Ebola at all. This research into the prevalence of Ebola-virus antibodies in dogs from regions of Gabon affected by the 20012002 outbreak showed that dogs can be infected by Ebola virus but exhibit no symptoms and the infection eventually clears.
The researchers concluded that dogs could be a potential source of human Ebola outbreaks and of virus spread during human outbreaks, but they did not test their hypothesis that human infection could occur through licking, biting or grooming. Instead, the study assumed dogs would transmit the infection in the same way as other animals observed in experiments; those animals excreted viral particles (in saliva, urine, feces) for a short period before the virus was cleared. David Moore, an expert in infectious diseases from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that since no dogs showed symptoms of the Ebola virus there is absolutely no evidence to support a role for dogs in transmission.
The study also suggests that differences in behavior and diet of pet dogs may alter risks in Ebola transmission. Whereas most dogs in Western Europe are fed dog food, many of the dogs studied in Gabon scavenged for their food, eating small dead animals that could have exposed them to the virus.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
GTRO didn't condemn strangers to an agonizing death. She condemned the hypothetical killers
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#44
just last Monday, I told a co-worker that if I were facing quarantine for potential exposure
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#43
I don't know that they didn't, except that they had to beat protesters off with batons
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#46
agreed. not only would many not oppose, many would kill them now, just in case.
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#48
I cleaned out my ignore list with the new year, and then almost immediately started re-filling it
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#63
umm maybe you should inform yourself about Buddha before using his image. Buddha cared about all
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2014
#68
agreed. furthermore, the evidence is that they clear it from their system
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#76