Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: next time someone bashes ACA [View all]WillowTree
(5,348 posts)63. You don't know that!
Not all plans had annual and lifetime limits. Mine didn't before ACA and still doesn't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your post is seething with hate and resentment. Why? You are blaming the WRONG
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2014
#3
The ACA is effective, when it is followed. The states that chose to reject the free Medicaid funds
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#62
So? It's still not the Dems fault that the Rethugs prevented the Medicaid expansion.
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#83
No, there isn't. That's only the case for people who would fit into the Medicaid expansion.
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#86
That isn't the fault of the ACA. It's the fault of your Rethug governor who turned down free Federal
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#80
I'm projecting? Really? Why would I be projecting? I'm not the one who is misdirecting anger at the
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2014
#41
Your post should be about how we will fix this in the future with Single Payer, rather than
grahamhgreen
Oct 2014
#76
Your information is wrong. The CBO says that under the ACA, 20 million Americans
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#60
Wrong. The link I provided compared the numbers this year to those of one year ago, not 2010.
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#69
That's because that was the most recent statistic -- THEN. It makes no sense to compare
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#117
And that is still the goal. But no one EVER (except you maybe) thought that was supposed to
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#120
You've got things exactly backward. If you go back to when the ACA was first passed,
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#131
I have no idea what you're even saying now. "We are now at 13ish percent coverage."
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#134
Then the OP shouldn't say send them to me if you hear someone criticize the ACA
scarystuffyo
Oct 2014
#10
I understand that but it was a figure of speech you should have left out in your post.
scarystuffyo
Oct 2014
#16
Please do write the President.. of course he would care, strawberries. So glad for your son & fam!
Cha
Oct 2014
#37
Where did you get your made-up statistic that 50% of people who got "support from the exchanges"
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#56
No, you haven't, except to the one link with 2006-7 figures. And you're not giving me a link to
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#121
This is a matter of simple logic. The subsidies are calculated and SET to be no more
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#125
I have a brother in NC who works 2 part time jobs but doesn't make enough income to get a
scarystuffyo
Oct 2014
#9
He/She should probably edit out that snark. It was uncalled for . Sorry your brother can't
SammyWinstonJack
Oct 2014
#15
Oh, so he would qualify for the medicaid expansion if the Republican Gov. hadn't blocked it.
Lex
Oct 2014
#38
Welcome to DU. My bill went down by more than half. Deductible is half what it was.
Lex
Oct 2014
#30
Your old policy had an annual and lifetime limit on benefits. Do you know what they were?
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#54
I break it down into the fundamentals. No more do employees have to rely on the boss
Rex
Oct 2014
#42
No I mean by proposing it as often as the GOP proposes repealing Obamacare, instead of
grahamhgreen
Oct 2014
#127