Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The real reason there are so many threads about alleged "Progressive vote suppression" [View all]
You do realize that Ivans died years ago, correct?
Yeah, so?
When was the last time Nader ran?
What does that matter?
And your now wheeling out the 'progressives stayed home in 2010' canard again?
No.
Yeah, so?
When was the last time Nader ran?
What does that matter?
And your now wheeling out the 'progressives stayed home in 2010' canard again?
No.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The real reason there are so many threads about alleged "Progressive vote suppression" [View all]
Savannahmann
Oct 2014
OP
It also helps justify continued dismissal of progressive issues and values by "Party Loyalists"
Scootaloo
Oct 2014
#1
There are high profile examples of 'progressives' discouraging voting or advocating third parties
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#2
Oh yeah - that Ted Rall piece at Alternet telling 'progressives' to break up with Democrats
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#16
to show 'progressives' have threatened to sit out elections or support third party candidates
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#54
Supreme Court overturning the Voting Rights Act this year is, of course, purely coincidental.
ieoeja
Oct 2014
#14
The truth is that corporatists seek closely divided government, not majorities.
woo me with science
Oct 2014
#31
+1000. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out the D's collude with the R's to suppress the 99%.
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2014
#33
I mostly agree with this, but I see nothing wrong with the 'War on Women' as one
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#35
I'll take the local paper over the soppy conservative NY Times, thanks. nt
AverageJoe90
Oct 2014
#48
Women's turnout, and especially young women and women of color, is vital to Dem victories.
LeftyMom
Oct 2014
#45
Are you suggesting that Democratic Party leadership is posting threads on DU?
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#42