Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ruggerson

(17,483 posts)
40. Congress is not going to be doing anything on ENDA for a long, long time
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 10:42 PM
Apr 2012

unless we once again control both chambers.

There is a rich history in our country of (mostly) Democratic Presidents using the legitimate power of the EO to build and strengthen a more just society.

The proposed EO amends EO 11246 by adding sexual orientation to the list of those already afforded equal opportunity under the law.

History of Executive Order 11246

On September 24, 1965-more than two years after the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his "I Have A Dream" speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and more than a year after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became the law of the land-the Nation took a historic step towards equal employment opportunity when President Lyndon Johnson issued Executive Order 11246.

For the first time, EO 11246 charged the Secretary of Labor, a Cabinet-level official with strong enforcement authority, with the responsibility of ensuring equal opportunity for minorities in federal contractors' recruitment, hiring, training and other employment practices. .Until that time, such efforts had been in the hands of various Presidential committees. EO 11246 continued and reinforced the requirement that federal contractors not discriminate in employment and take affirmative action to ensure equal opportunity based on race, color, religion and national origin.

Signed by President Johnson that early autumn Friday 45 years ago, EO 11246 became a key landmark in a series of federal actions aimed at ending racial, religious and ethnic discrimination, an effort that dated back to the anxious days before the U.S. was thrust into World War II.

EO 8802

As America geared up its industrial might for what proved to be its inevitable entrance into a global war, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt responded to leaders, such as A. Philip Randolph and Baynard Rustin, who protested that African-American workers were blocked from taking jobs in segregated war production factories. On June 25, 1941, FDR signed Executive Order 8802, outlawing discrimination based on race, color, creed and national origin in the federal government and defense industries.

EO 9346

In 1943, President Roosevelt broadened the coverage of Executive Order 8802 by making it applicable to all government contractors.

EO 10308

Nearly a decade later, on December 3, 1951, President Harry S. Truman's Executive Order 10308 advanced the achievements initiated during WWII by creating the Committee on Government Contract Compliance. The committee, as its name implies, was tasked with overseeing compliance by federal contractors with the non-discrimination provisions of Executive Order 8802.

EO 10479

President Dwight D. Eisenhower took a further step on August 13, 1953, by creating the President's Committee on Government Contracts under Executive Order 10479. This reorganization furthered the principle that "…it is the obligation of the contracting agencies of the United States Government and government contractors to insure compliance with, and successful execution of, the equal employment opportunity program of the United States Government."

This Executive Order made the head of each contracting agency of the federal government responsible for obtaining compliance by their contractors and subcontractors with the nondiscrimination provisions of the contracts into which they entered. Coordination would be provided by the President's Committee on Government Contracts, housed in the Department of Labor, and comprised of representatives of major contracting agencies, the Labor and Justice Departments, and the General Services Administration as well as eight Presidential appointees. The President designated the Committee's chair and vice chair.

EO 10925

By the time John F. Kennedy was elected President, it was evident that to advance equal employment opportunity federal involvement needed to be broader and more proactive. On March 6, 1961, shortly after JFK took office, he signed Executive Order 10925, opening a new chapter in achieving access to good jobs by requiring government contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin."

Executive Order 10925 gave federal contracting agencies authority to institute procedures against federal contractors who violated their EEO obligations-including contract cancellation, debarment from future contracts and other sanctions.

It also created the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, which upon passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 became the Equal Employment Opportunity Committee. The President's Committee was chaired by Vice President Lyndon Johnson and later by Vice President Hubert Humphrey. The Committee's vice chair was Secretary of Labor Willard Wirtz.

Like its predecessors, EO 10925 gave each federal department and agency Executive Order enforcement responsibility for its contractors, and each developed its own organizational approach to carrying out these responsibilities. The President's Committee oversaw issues of policy and the Department of Labor played a coordinating role.

EO 11246

President Johnson's vision of creating a "Great Society" led to a host of endeavors that sought to change the political, social and economic landscape of the U.S. In his 1965 commencement address to graduates of Harvard University, LBJ gave voice to his vision, declaring, "We seek not just freedom but opportunity. We seek not just legal equity but human ability, not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result."

At LBJ's request, Vice President Humphrey led a comprehensive review "of the activities of the various federal agencies involved in the field of civil rights." Humphrey's conclusions and recommendations, articulated in a memorandum to Johnson, were based on the principle that "…whenever possible operating functions should be performed by departments and agencies with clearly defined responsibilities, as distinguished from interagency committees or other interagency arrangements. That principle is particularly applicable to civil rights programs where it is essential that our objectives be pursued vigorously and without delay that frequently accompanies a proliferation of interagency committees and groups."

The Vice President continued, "The Secretary of Labor, as Vice Chairman of the [President's] Committee [on Equal Employment Opportunity], has had primary responsibility for reviewing complaints and, through the contracting departments and agencies, insuring compliance by government contractors with nondiscrimination requirements. With all the experience gained over a period of years by the personnel involved in this program, responsibility should now be vested directly in the Department of Labor, and I so recommend."

Thus, on September 24, 1965, President Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, making the Secretary of Labor responsible for administering the order's non-discrimination and affirmative action provisions. Soon thereafter, Secretary of Labor Wirtz established the Office of Federal Contract Compliance. Edward C. Sylvester, Jr. was appointed as the agency's first director.

Today, Executive Order 11246, as amended and further strengthened over the years, remains a major safeguard, protecting the rights of workers employed by federal contractors-approximately one-fifth of the entire U.S. labor force-to remain free from discrimination on the basis of their gender, race, religion, color or national origin…and opening the doors of opportunity through its affirmative action provisions.

http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/about/History_EO11246.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

courage and leadership are in short supply in the republican-lite party nt msongs Apr 2012 #1
You are seeing what you're seei.g because Occulus Apr 2012 #2
Wow. The whole national issue is caused by "several DUers"? That seems like an easy fix. saras Apr 2012 #3
Yeah, that is EXACTLY what I meant. Occulus Apr 2012 #4
congratulations, your post survived the challenge mitchtv Apr 2012 #6
The fact an alert was sent is proof of the truth of the post. Occulus Apr 2012 #7
Yep. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2012 #9
no it's not. that's absurd. cali Apr 2012 #13
why would someone alert on it? ruggerson Apr 2012 #14
'Zactly. Occulus Apr 2012 #15
More like they're indifferent. Marr Apr 2012 #37
they're trying to get support for Barney Frank's bill instead, to make the change permanent bigtree Apr 2012 #5
You apparently are not familiar with the history of ENDA ruggerson Apr 2012 #11
makes no sense bigtree Apr 2012 #22
While I think he does want to change it, I'm unconvinced an executive order would hurt it. joshcryer Apr 2012 #24
of course it's political bigtree Apr 2012 #28
Yes, I have no doubt had he had the Congress back he would deliver EDNA. No doubt. joshcryer Apr 2012 #38
I think, unfortunately, politics trumps courage for the President right now ruggerson Apr 2012 #30
I don't agree with making the WH (and Barack Obama's unilateral order) the issue in this election bigtree Apr 2012 #32
The ENDA has come up in Congress each session less one, since 1994 Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Apr 2012 #41
Congress is not going to be doing anything on ENDA for a long, long time ruggerson Apr 2012 #40
you do know that Johnson's executive order came AFTER passage of the Civil Rights Act? bigtree Apr 2012 #45
"now is not the time" Occulus Apr 2012 #12
remarkably similar to the attacks on supporters of LGBT rights during the DADT repeal debate bigtree Apr 2012 #23
While those are stupid arguments they don't mean someone is anti-gay. joshcryer Apr 2012 #25
well they could be both ruggerson Apr 2012 #31
True! joshcryer Apr 2012 #34
Can you outline how it could put a lid on the measure for good? joshcryer Apr 2012 #27
the issue would be framed as some battle against Obama and his unilateral action bigtree Apr 2012 #29
Executive orders are well within a Presidents right, across the board, no question. joshcryer Apr 2012 #35
Election calculations are their only concern, not what is right or wrong. mmonk Apr 2012 #8
"Recent years" being "all of the years since the last election." (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2012 #10
More like "since 1994" Doctor_J Apr 2012 #16
Their calculations are way off Doctor_J Apr 2012 #17
I'm gonna agree with the Doctor, here. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #19
Same reason they're still letting the DOJ throw cancer grannies in prison for pot smoking Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #18
I'm not sure about the EO, but I do know that the public isn't crazy about EOs.... Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #20
My only pushback is the target of the push-forward. Bolo Boffin Apr 2012 #21
I agree. And this is why Democrats are weak. joshcryer Apr 2012 #26
Only one hand in America can sign that order. Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #33
And there are many things that hand must take into account. Bolo Boffin Apr 2012 #39
This is all a fantasia not a set of facts.... Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #42
This discussion moved from my thread to this one. Bolo Boffin Apr 2012 #43
Even if Obama wins re-election and we retake the House, I doubt ENDA survives a Repub filibuster LonePirate Apr 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Democrats cannot suppo...»Reply #40