Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The real reason there are so many threads about alleged "Progressive vote suppression" [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)70. That is patently false, though.
Cutting the payroll tax in half for 98 percent of businesses: The Presidents plan will cut in half the taxes paid by businesses on their first $5 million in payroll, targeting the benefit to the 98 percent of firms that have payroll below this threshold.
A complete payroll tax holiday for added workers or increased wages: The Presidents plan will completely eliminate payroll taxes for firms that increase their payroll by adding new workers or increasing the wages of their current worker (the benefit is capped at the first $50 million in payroll increases).
Extending 100% expensing into 2012: This continues an effective incentive for new investment.
Reforms and regulatory reductions to help entrepreneurs and small businesses access capital.
A complete payroll tax holiday for added workers or increased wages: The Presidents plan will completely eliminate payroll taxes for firms that increase their payroll by adding new workers or increasing the wages of their current worker (the benefit is capped at the first $50 million in payroll increases).
Extending 100% expensing into 2012: This continues an effective incentive for new investment.
Reforms and regulatory reductions to help entrepreneurs and small businesses access capital.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/08/fact-sheet-american-jobs-act
It in fact targets only small businesses, unless you think $5 million payroll is a "big business" (that'd employ about 300 people at minimum wage, and that's not how business works either).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The real reason there are so many threads about alleged "Progressive vote suppression" [View all]
Savannahmann
Oct 2014
OP
It also helps justify continued dismissal of progressive issues and values by "Party Loyalists"
Scootaloo
Oct 2014
#1
There are high profile examples of 'progressives' discouraging voting or advocating third parties
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#2
Oh yeah - that Ted Rall piece at Alternet telling 'progressives' to break up with Democrats
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#16
to show 'progressives' have threatened to sit out elections or support third party candidates
wyldwolf
Oct 2014
#54
Supreme Court overturning the Voting Rights Act this year is, of course, purely coincidental.
ieoeja
Oct 2014
#14
The truth is that corporatists seek closely divided government, not majorities.
woo me with science
Oct 2014
#31
+1000. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out the D's collude with the R's to suppress the 99%.
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2014
#33
I mostly agree with this, but I see nothing wrong with the 'War on Women' as one
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#35
I'll take the local paper over the soppy conservative NY Times, thanks. nt
AverageJoe90
Oct 2014
#48
Women's turnout, and especially young women and women of color, is vital to Dem victories.
LeftyMom
Oct 2014
#45
Are you suggesting that Democratic Party leadership is posting threads on DU?
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#42