Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal In Texas

(16,271 posts)
4. The lifeboat regs hadn't been changed since 1894.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:44 AM
Apr 2012

At that time the regs were based on a ship of 10,000 tons. The biggest ship in 1894 was half that size. Titanic was over 46,000 tons. The regs were never updated, and there was no provision to increase the number of lifeboats in proportion to increased weight.

Ironically, Alexander Carlisle the ship's original designer had proposed 64 boats (enough for every person on the ship), then cut that to 32 and davits to accommodate them. White Star's Ismay cut that to 16 wooden boats and 4 emergency collapsible lifeboats, which exceeded the Board of Trade law. (Data from: 1912 Facts About Titanic, Revised Edition 2003 by Lee W. Merideth)

The lack of oversight by the Board of Trade, in the words of Sir Alfred Chalmers of the Board he rationalized:

I considered the matter very closely from time to time...I found it was the safest mode of travel in the world, and I thought it was neither right nor the duty of a State Department to impose regulations upon that mode of travel as long as the record was a clean one...as ships grew bigger, there were such improvements made in their construction that they were stronger and better ships...that that was the road along which the shipowners were going to travel, and that they should not be interfered with...the voluntary action of the owners was carrying them beyond the requirements of our scale, and when voluntary action on the part of shipowners is doing that, I think that any State Department should hold its hand before it steps in to make a hard-and-fast scale for that particular type of shipping. http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/item/4865/

This is very much like the arguments we hear today. That regulation should be relaxed or abolished. That private enterprise will regulate itself.

Clearly, with over 1500 people dead, that did not work. Again, this is a classic cautionary tale I like to use in arguments with righties when they bring up the self-regulation meme.


Survivors aboard one of the
collapsible lifeboats.
(Note the canvass sides.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Titanic goes down in ...»Reply #4