General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

12. would someone expect a picture to be taken there?

Sun Oct 12, 2014, 04:57 PM

Oct 2014

A locker room is not a public park. Nobody was taking a shower on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

These are the steps of the Lincoln Memorial:

That particular picture was taken and is shown on the blog of the woman in pink in the center.

In order to have that picture taken of herself on those steps, did anyone say to the two girls on the right that their picture from that angle was going to be published on the internet?

However, at any given time anywhere from dozens to hundreds of people are sitting on that major tourist attraction, and just as many are taking pictures of it.

What would you do? Ban taking pictures at one of the most photographed objects in DC, or ban people sitting on the steps in short skirts? Because you are going to have to do one or the other.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox News Guest/Defense Attorney: Upskirt Victims �Made a Conscious Choice To Wear Certain Clothes' [View all] big_dog Oct 2014 OP

Intentionally misleading title. nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #1

Hooha underpants Oct 2014 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Oct 2014 #4

I'm waiting to see that one in a judicial opinion. n/t winter is coming Oct 2014 #32

So how would this attorney feel about a camera in the bathroom stall where she pees? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #3

In a bathroom stall one legally has an "expectation of privacy". Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #6

well when I am walking around in public....I have an expectation of what is under my clothes as VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #7

I believe in a locker room shower there would also be an expectation of privacy. (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #8

How ....they are not showering privately....they are showering publically among each other.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #9

would someone expect a picture to be taken there? jberryhill Oct 2014 #12

I don't "expect" a camera up my skirt either! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #14

What if "up" isn't vertical? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #18

which means its open season to have your shit photographed and published? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #20

Can you explain the difference between this case and pictures taken at the beach? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #24

So men have to be specifically told . . . Brigid Oct 2014 #5

Very clear case of apples trying to debate oranges... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #10

So there is no illegality of harassing a woman walking into an abortion clinic. . . Laffy Kat Oct 2014 #11

No one stuck a camera ... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #13

this attorney specifically said "upskirt".....we KNOW what that means... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #15

Well, the lawyer's legal analysis... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #21

so anytime a woman has an accident and some part of her body is accidentally exposed... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #22

I can't really address that question as posed... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #25

Maybe I'm missing details, but where did the "sticking a camera up a skirt" occur in this case? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #17

Details are severely elusive with this report. Sherman A1 Oct 2014 #19

If someone displays body parts in public they may well be recorded. immoderate Oct 2014 #16

Well, her scuzzball client chose to carry his testicles out in public gratuitous Oct 2014 #23

Simple solution... Takket Oct 2014 #26

New business for the women of Afghanistan: Brigid Oct 2014 #28

Well, I guess if those women 'placed their Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #27

Fox news is an upskirt camera. GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2014 #29

Because when you turn it on... Dr. Strange Oct 2014 #30

Classic. Well done. N/t. Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #31

When I'm out in public I wear either pants or shorts so I avoid that. I can't recall the last time I Louisiana1976 Oct 2014 #33