Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)

19. Details are severely elusive with this report.

Reply to Thor_MN (Reply #17)

Sun Oct 12, 2014, 05:28 PM

Oct 2014

The article in my opinion is rather poorly written and about sensationalism.

I very much believe in a person's right to privacy, but in a public setting as was indicated, assuming no attempt on the photographer to be covert. I don't see it as illegal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox News Guest/Defense Attorney: Upskirt Victims �Made a Conscious Choice To Wear Certain Clothes' [View all] big_dog Oct 2014 OP

Intentionally misleading title. nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #1

Hooha underpants Oct 2014 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Oct 2014 #4

I'm waiting to see that one in a judicial opinion. n/t winter is coming Oct 2014 #32

So how would this attorney feel about a camera in the bathroom stall where she pees? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #3

In a bathroom stall one legally has an "expectation of privacy". Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #6

well when I am walking around in public....I have an expectation of what is under my clothes as VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #7

I believe in a locker room shower there would also be an expectation of privacy. (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #8

How ....they are not showering privately....they are showering publically among each other.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #9

would someone expect a picture to be taken there? jberryhill Oct 2014 #12

I don't "expect" a camera up my skirt either! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #14

What if "up" isn't vertical? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #18

which means its open season to have your shit photographed and published? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #20

Can you explain the difference between this case and pictures taken at the beach? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #24

So men have to be specifically told . . . Brigid Oct 2014 #5

Very clear case of apples trying to debate oranges... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #10

So there is no illegality of harassing a woman walking into an abortion clinic. . . Laffy Kat Oct 2014 #11

No one stuck a camera ... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #13

this attorney specifically said "upskirt".....we KNOW what that means... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #15

Well, the lawyer's legal analysis... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #21

so anytime a woman has an accident and some part of her body is accidentally exposed... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #22

I can't really address that question as posed... Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #25

Maybe I'm missing details, but where did the "sticking a camera up a skirt" occur in this case? Thor_MN Oct 2014 #17

Details are severely elusive with this report. Sherman A1 Oct 2014 #19

If someone displays body parts in public they may well be recorded. immoderate Oct 2014 #16

Well, her scuzzball client chose to carry his testicles out in public gratuitous Oct 2014 #23

Simple solution... Takket Oct 2014 #26

New business for the women of Afghanistan: Brigid Oct 2014 #28

Well, I guess if those women 'placed their Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #27

Fox news is an upskirt camera. GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2014 #29

Because when you turn it on... Dr. Strange Oct 2014 #30

Classic. Well done. N/t. Whiskeytide Oct 2014 #31

When I'm out in public I wear either pants or shorts so I avoid that. I can't recall the last time I Louisiana1976 Oct 2014 #33