Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,323 posts)

8. Port Arthur is near the TX/LA border. It's probably a shorter drive to get to the

Reply to 840high (Reply #4)

Mon Oct 13, 2014, 12:03 AM

Oct 2014

site in Sulphur than to a TX site. And Port Arthur is a regular customer of the facility in Lousiana.

Why should this case be handled differently?

Incinerated waste can't pose any risk. Really.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lousiana tries to block incinerated Ebola waste from Texas. [View all] pnwmom Oct 2014 OP

When you know absolutely ZERO about science, of course you're kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #1

Your last line made me laugh. nt WhiteAndNerdy Oct 2014 #7

DUzy, great post, thank you. uppityperson Oct 2014 #9

Why is Texas shipping it to LA in the first place? Suich Oct 2014 #2

Texas has no room for garbage! csziggy Oct 2014 #3

HAHAHAHA! elleng Oct 2014 #6

Yep. Rick Perry is allergic to reality. That sh*ts ...gtg. nt littlemissmartypants Oct 2014 #12

Because the border city Port Arthur facility has an ongoing contract with that Louisiana landfill. pnwmom Oct 2014 #5

Especially given the traditional Texas love of fine white powders. Scootaloo Oct 2014 #16

Keeo it in Texas. 840high Oct 2014 #4

Port Arthur is near the TX/LA border. It's probably a shorter drive to get to the pnwmom Oct 2014 #8

Didn't know that. Thanks. 840high Oct 2014 #10

If it is harmless, why does it need to go to a hazardous waste landfill? nt SunSeeker Oct 2014 #11

Good question. n/t Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #13

Probably because some of the waste burned in Port Arthur may be hazardous,. pnwmom Oct 2014 #14

That makes sense. Thanks. nt SunSeeker Oct 2014 #15