Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(96,895 posts)
28. You are on a roll~
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 11:44 PM
Oct 2014

And I am so damn tired tonight...gotta go soon.

Thanks so much for all you brilliant adds to smartypants post.

This one is perfect, Cha. He damn well supported her work @ CFPB.

Not sure what she was doing in that interview.

However.

A GOP Senate's First Target: Elizabeth Warren’s Consumer Protection Agency
For years, House Republicans have been trying to gut her greatest accomplishment.


If the GOP wins the Senate, they'll no doubt use the opportunity to push through a range of measures that are kryptonite to Democratic voters—new abortion restrictions, limits on the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency to combat climate change, a relaxation of the rules reining in Wall Street's worst excesses.

But Republicans are particularly keen on handicapping one particular federal watchdog: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the three-year-old agency that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) devised and helped build in the wake of the financial crisis.

The bureau's job is to make sure Americans aren't getting screwed by mortgage lenders, credit card companies, debt collectors, and other financial institutions. It's the first federal agency designed specifically to protect everyday consumers from financial wrongdoing, and Republicans have done everything in their power to hobble the agency—including fighting the confirmation of its director, Richard Cordray. Winning the Senate in November could be their best chance to roll back Warren's greatest accomplishment.

"You just have to watch the House to see what is going to come out of the Senate."

Half of their work is already done. The House has passed a bill that would limit the bureau's power by replacing its director with a five-member panel, and subjecting its budget to the congressional appropriations process—meaning that hostile lawmakers could starve it to death. (Unlike most federal agencies, the bureau is bankrolled by the Federal Reserve, an effort to free it from the whims of partisan politics.) House Republicans have also introduced legislation to let other financial regulators overturn CFPB rules, to eliminate a fund the bureau uses to compensate consumers who've been defrauded by an institution that's gone belly-up, and to restrict the kind of data the bureau may collect from consumers. (Republicans have charged that the CFPB's collection of credit data is a violation of privacy, even though the bureau does not collect any personal details the consumer doesn't volunteer.)

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/republican-senate-would-gut-elizabeth-warren-consumer-protection-bureau

I keep asking the question Cha. Why do so many want her out of her Senate seat to run for President!? I believe I know that answer, I sure wish that those that support her run would look at the facts.

We voted for her in MA for what she tried to do in CFPB! Now many want her to leave, not surprising since the GOP and Wall Street want her gone as well.

There is a game at foot and it smells Cha. Is someone trying to make her look bad? Anti Obama? That is an interesting question.

Something stinks in Denmark!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A President, I am told, can hire all kinds of people who then concentrate on individual issues djean111 Oct 2014 #1
I think if she's president, then more progressive have a shot at her seat AND her cabinet! cascadiance Oct 2014 #14
I agree with you wholeheartedly. djean111 Oct 2014 #21
Actually, no the OP does not imply this... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #24
I assume you meant this response to me, the OP. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #23
No, it was this - djean111 Oct 2014 #39
I know that special elections are a problem sometimes, even in a blue state like Massachusetts cascadiance Oct 2014 #43
Why wouldn't she be able to handle domestic and foreign policy scarystuffyo Oct 2014 #2
Lol! zappaman Oct 2014 #3
Exactly... SidDithers Oct 2014 #7
Did I say she couldn't handle it? No I did not. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #5
Didn't you write this? or was that part of the article? scarystuffyo Oct 2014 #6
The whole point flew over your head. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #11
I hope she stays in the Senate bigwillq Oct 2014 #4
There are very good reasons for her to run sadoldgirl Oct 2014 #8
She is the new face in the Senate. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #25
I disagree with this analysis - the blog analysis I mean el_bryanto Oct 2014 #9
Good timing front smartypants, she.. just when Cha Oct 2014 #10
Yes we are less than a month out from the midterms sheshe2 Oct 2014 #13
Another critique on Elizabeth's interview with Thomas Frank, she.. Cha Oct 2014 #15
This is going to sting! Brava Cha! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #16
krebscycle was pissed! Cha Oct 2014 #18
OMG! Did you see how these 2 reacted when they heard that krebscycle was pissed? Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #36
She would have to deal with Congress as any other President treestar Oct 2014 #12
It's easy to complain. The view is very different looking out from the White House. branford Oct 2014 #33
I think the people who want Warren for President MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #17
Oh you silly, Manny... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #26
Would you consider meeting me in Boston when I go to meet sheshe2? Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #31
I thought creepy stalker types was suppose to describe the Warren supporters davidpdx Oct 2014 #32
Where you wrote "A hit and a miss..." did you mean to say "A swing and a miss..." ? nt Electric Monk Oct 2014 #19
Actually if you follow the link... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #27
Thank you madokie Oct 2014 #20
Elizabeth Warren: 'The President was the one who refused to throw CFPB under the bus' Cha Oct 2014 #22
You are on a roll~ sheshe2 Oct 2014 #28
"The one thing the Obama administration didn't do was pillory banks and financial institutions rhett o rick Oct 2014 #29
littlemisssmartypants is not very smart. at all. cali Oct 2014 #30
Her endgame is hard to fathom. ucrdem Oct 2014 #34
Calling Rick Perry . . . Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #35
I sure hope he finds that new job soon! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #41
so many betrayals, so little time... n/t PowerToThePeople Oct 2014 #37
Try this, sheshe: freshwest Oct 2014 #38
Excellent posting freshwest. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #42
She has a lot of potential as a Senator, but..... George II Oct 2014 #40
Try googling... MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #44
I'm familiar with her background, but she's done so little, well below her potential...... George II Oct 2014 #45
For example, what has Hillary succeeded at that's as consequential MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A hit and a miss from Sen...»Reply #28