General Discussion

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)

21. So because Harry Houdini wasn't really a spy that means Standard Oil wasn't really a conspiracy?

Reply to zappaman (Reply #8)

Mon Oct 13, 2014, 12:44 PM

Oct 2014

That's your "logic" here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

147 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Man Who Tricked Chemtrails Conspiracy Theorists [View all] zappaman Oct 2014 OP

Just spray 'em with vinegar... SidDithers Oct 2014 #1

I miss Spiralhawk, Berlum and whatever other identities she had... zappaman Oct 2014 #2

Oh my God, that thread again! NuclearDem Oct 2014 #3

Funnier than this? zappaman Oct 2014 #4

Two very separate schools of comedy. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #6

I've always been a fan of the classics. name not needed Oct 2014 #136

Not quite as funny as melting chicken wire... n/t cherokeeprogressive Oct 2014 #24

Another DU classic... SidDithers Oct 2014 #35

Thanks for bring that up...za RobertEarl Oct 2014 #27

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #46

He'll insist it's still coming. jeff47 Oct 2014 #51

What will happen to the tons of waste? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #52

Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #60

Not real? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #62

Too easy with you AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #64

or just here to make anti-nuke advocates look bad. zappaman Oct 2014 #65

OMG! Are you series? This thread about chem trails got Analyst? Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #92

No. You don't appear that way at all. RobertEarl Oct 2014 #66

I don't appear intelligent to you? AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #67

Your posts define you, not I. RobertEarl Oct 2014 #68

Since everything is Bizarro world to you AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #69

No. I forgive you. RobertEarl Oct 2014 #70

you aren't a serious poster, quit playing games with us CreekDog Oct 2014 #141

This is weird RobertEarl Oct 2014 #143

Wasn't he thrown out of the E & E group? zappaman Oct 2014 #145

Answer zappaman Oct 2014 #53

I thought the sea star 'melting' was a problem related to Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #79

Shhhhhh! zappaman Oct 2014 #81

acidification RobertEarl Oct 2014 #87

That thread is outdated because we now know the starfish are being killed by Ebola. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #117

That's real? Atman Oct 2014 #9

I wish they wouldn't include us truthers in other crazy conspiracies Politicalboi Oct 2014 #5

We know you can't help it. zappaman Oct 2014 #8

So because Harry Houdini wasn't really a spy that means Standard Oil wasn't really a conspiracy? Electric Monk Oct 2014 #21

Did Standard Oil establish a monopoly through a mind control machine? NuclearDem Oct 2014 #61

Your lack of understanding of physics doesn't mean it's a conspiracy. FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #12

+1 HuckleB Oct 2014 #131

They should - they're just as crazy. Drunken Irishman Oct 2014 #15

No, they're not. Atman Oct 2014 #23

And the Sandy Hook denialists have lots of claims of off-the-record jeff47 Oct 2014 #38

Yes, because claims of "off the record birth certificates" are exactly the same... Atman Oct 2014 #40

The fact that you believe one does not make it true. jeff47 Oct 2014 #49

we live in a country questionseverything Oct 2014 #54

Think about who the victims were. jeff47 Oct 2014 #75

I like how no one elses suggestions add up. But yours are concrete. Atman Oct 2014 #82

To quote Dr. Tyson.... Oktober Oct 2014 #86

Because yours are based on a misunderstanding of how structures are built jeff47 Oct 2014 #122

There was no heat load on the lower floors. Atman Oct 2014 #124

Because cars aren't crushed when they hit things. jeff47 Oct 2014 #125

You don't have to explain anything to me. Atman Oct 2014 #126

You make way too many assumptions about what I know. Atman Oct 2014 #127

"You can't melt steel with jet fuel." zappaman Oct 2014 #128

Actually, there are photographs of molten steel pouring out of the towers. Atman Oct 2014 #129

No there aren't. zappaman Oct 2014 #130

really, come on you are killing us here- snooper2 Oct 2014 #142

so we have established that the cia did pull off a huge ct questionseverything Oct 2014 #99

No, it actually wasn't that huge. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2014 #121

Why did there have to "hundreds of thousands" involved? Atman Oct 2014 #55

"I don't think Bush could masturbate without assistance" zappaman Oct 2014 #56

Because that's what it would take for it to be "MIC forced" or "pulling other strings" jeff47 Oct 2014 #74

I live in New England. Don't give me that "build a house" shit. Atman Oct 2014 #78

A large building has a hell of a lot more inertia than a house cpwm17 Oct 2014 #112

Wrong. zappaman Oct 2014 #113

Physics fail! cpwm17 Oct 2014 #114

Oh man I somehow missed that one! Now I understand the reference to melting chicken wire. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #120

And a 2 story barn falling down from neglect is exactly like a skyscraper hit by a plane. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #119

It is exactly the same.Made up shit! nt Logical Oct 2014 #59

+1 n/t tammywammy Oct 2014 #26

Kind of hard to argue with...but many people will, and do. Atman Oct 2014 #19

PNAC had me at "a new Pearl Harbor." nt valerief Oct 2014 #29

Yeah, but we're supposed to pretend none of that ever happened. Atman Oct 2014 #32

And when we did launch some interceptors Cheap_Trick Oct 2014 #33

...because prior to 9/11, supersonic flights over the US were illegal. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #77

Gee, I think we could've bent the rules for an emergency such as this. Cheap_Trick Oct 2014 #90

Even if we did "bend the rules" just that one time... NuclearDem Oct 2014 #93

Uh, we have a new invention called "radar" Cheap_Trick Oct 2014 #98

Yes, I'm aware of radar. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #102

Did you see how long it took them to intercept Payne Stewart's plane? hack89 Oct 2014 #105

You might want to look up what after-burners do to fuel consumption.. EX500rider Oct 2014 #80

Maybe if we'd sent up interceptors as soon as the first plane's transponder was switched off Cheap_Trick Oct 2014 #91

And again, how exactly were they supposed to locate the aircraft? NuclearDem Oct 2014 #95

The DoD has no way of knowing if a transponder is turned off hack89 Oct 2014 #137

Do you understand what top speed does for fuel consumption? hack89 Oct 2014 #88

I'd start here: EX500rider Oct 2014 #73

Can't trust Popular Mechanics. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #76

One of the greatest lines ever. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #36

These guys are almost as humorous as the chem-trail guys FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #41

Jet engines didn't fall to the street. Fusilage didn't fall to the street. Atman Oct 2014 #42

the hell they didn't jberryhill Oct 2014 #83

Whoopsie! zappaman Oct 2014 #84

Inconvenient... at best. LanternWaste Oct 2014 #101

"Jet engines didn't fall to the street. Fusilage didn't fall to the street." NCTraveler Oct 2014 #94

Same argument is made about the Pentagon plane. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #108

Correct, that was a dumb thing to say. Atman Oct 2014 #97

Bullpuckey jberryhill Oct 2014 #100

"Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel" NuclearDem Oct 2014 #103

You obviously don't have much experience with large fires. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #107

And then giant structures conveniently fall perfectly into their own footprint. Atman Oct 2014 #110

Yeah, over 40 buildings were damaged by the WTC falling "perfectly into their own footprint." zappaman Oct 2014 #111

There you go again, using actual facts as evidence. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #116

Yeah you are "not a truther" you just use exactly the same (false) arguments. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #115

Also, nice Gish Gallop once your original statement was quickly proved false. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #109

I was going to mention that jberryhill Oct 2014 #132

It wasn't a "dumb thing to say", it was an absolutely untrue and false thing to say jberryhill Oct 2014 #134

"it won't matter that each of them is untrue and false - it's the volume of them which is yellowcanine Oct 2014 #135

20 year military vet here AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #45

Don't try logic on these fools FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #47

I feel compelled somedays AnalystInParadise Oct 2014 #48

+1000 thank you for this! nt Logical Oct 2014 #58

Almost everything you said there is totally made up shit. Wow, you scare me. nt Logical Oct 2014 #57

"I can't understand it, therefore, it's not true." NuclearDem Oct 2014 #63

"leave NO debris anywhere near the buildings." EX500rider Oct 2014 #71

Planted. zappaman Oct 2014 #72

You ever think that there is a reason? Oktober Oct 2014 #85

Interesting, I did not think we are allowed to even bring up this subject. Rex Oct 2014 #7

Nothing wrong with discussing a hoax. zappaman Oct 2014 #11

I mean the 'word that shall not be said on DU'. Rex Oct 2014 #14

Good luck! zappaman Oct 2014 #17

Will do. Rex Oct 2014 #25

investigation is being demanded by 400 Shasta residents J_J_ Oct 2014 #10

We need a Conspiracy Theory Tax. You want your favorite theory investigated, pay up. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #118

Best idea ever! zappaman Oct 2014 #123

That's great. FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #13

I handle discussion with the chemtrails folks this way... stevenleser Oct 2014 #16

That's a good idea! zappaman Oct 2014 #18

The mentally ill don't handle actual science well. SwankyXomb Oct 2014 #31

Well now that's just like asking them to give up their hopes and dreams. logosoco Oct 2014 #39

I'not a chem-trail conspiracy guy, but your test is impossible. lob1 Oct 2014 #44

Keep trying or hire a plane FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #50

There are a couple of reasons why your objection isn't quite right. stevenleser Oct 2014 #104

I'll even help out here Quackers Oct 2014 #89

Excellent! Well done! stevenleser Oct 2014 #96

Love this! zappaman Oct 2014 #106

Ha wheniwasincongress Oct 2014 #20

My elderly dad believe all this hokum procon Oct 2014 #22

So, your Dad is aware? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #34

"the military ... did use airplanes to disperse chemicals into hurricanes?" Yeah and so what? yellowcanine Oct 2014 #138

Agent orange in VN? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #139

No, because I do not claim those chemicals are causing "Chemtrails" yellowcanine Oct 2014 #140

Well RobertEarl Oct 2014 #144

Science, Bob. zappaman Oct 2014 #146

I had a lady ask me if I knew what those streaks in the sky were. Turbineguy Oct 2014 #28

TV is used to influence our thinking. The govt doesn't need chemtrails. nt valerief Oct 2014 #30

How did you keep from busting out laughing right then and there? FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #43

Chemtrails only work on crazy people jberryhill Oct 2014 #133

I loved Chemtrail Central....best place to troll paranoids on the net. ileus Oct 2014 #37

There have been multiple experiments, including 9/11 groundings... hunter Oct 2014 #147