General Discussion

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)

23. I see nothing wrong with what they did

Mon Oct 13, 2014, 03:22 PM

Oct 2014

Just like I see nothing wrong in card counting. If you're smart enough to count them, it's the casinos problem not yours. They just played stupid by going back and winning and winning. Had they kept it to a limit, they could have gone on for a long time. With that kind of money you could travel to other casinos around the US over the years. Anyway, I never understood why anyone would put money in a machine that KNOWS what card you need to win. My mother plays those machines for a nickle, but playing a a dollar a hand, is just plain crazy.

I trust the one armed bandit over the computer machines. If you have to read directions on how to play AKA lose your money, maybe you shouldn't play.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Finding a Video Poker Bug Made These Guys Rich�Then Vegas Made Them Pay [View all] brentspeak Oct 2014 OP

the RULES OF POKER? ChairmanAgnostic Oct 2014 #1

It's not gambling if you are guaranteed a win everytime. dilby Oct 2014 #2

The machines are programmed to favor the house brentspeak Oct 2014 #3

Should do, and do do. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #4

They do. They are required by law to state the avg. percent returned. Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #5

Not quite brentspeak Oct 2014 #13

Duh. They won't tell you at the machine level. Did you expect that? nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #15

Are you really that dense? brentspeak Oct 2014 #19

Its not misleading at all Travis_0004 Oct 2014 #28

I'm sorry -- where did you come from? brentspeak Oct 2014 #33

Excuse me sir, there is a problem with this machine. I'm winning money on it. DesMoinesDem Oct 2014 #6

that is exactly the stupidity of gambling- along with that you give that money belzabubba333 Oct 2014 #8

Yup - nonsense. closeupready Oct 2014 #11

Would you disclose ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #16

"You Spot Another Man's Tell . . ." ProfessorGAC Oct 2014 #20

I know ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #24

He did. Dr. Strange Oct 2014 #18

Gangsters have higher ethics than casinos gratuitous Oct 2014 #7

And that justified a SWAT style raid? NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #9

He's actually lucky to escape this adventure with his balls intact Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #29

This would make an awesome movie KamaAina Oct 2014 #10

Oceans 1 KurtNYC Oct 2014 #22

Sounds like the guys need to sue the casinos. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #12

I don't think it's possible to live long enough to sue a casino. nt valerief Oct 2014 #17

Most accurate statement in this whole thread. Lochloosa Oct 2014 #25

How?? Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #31

Sounds like Kane came out ahead Adsos Letter Oct 2014 #14

Electronic voting machine flaws and voter supression schemes rarely get this kind of attention. hunter Oct 2014 #21

I see nothing wrong with what they did Politicalboi Oct 2014 #23

It is more like adding to your bet after the cards are dealt in blackjack Johonny Oct 2014 #27

It seems like if anyone should be liable for this it would be the maker of the machines. Threedifferentones Oct 2014 #26

I love the closing paragraph Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #30

This reminds me of the "Press Your Luck" game show scandal. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #32