Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Who Cares who Alison Lundergan Grimes Voted For? [View all]
Last edited Tue Oct 14, 2014, 12:20 PM - Edit history (1)
http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/who-cares-who-alison-lundergan-grimes-voted-for/Source info at the link.
Mitchy McConnell tells a lot of lies. A LOT of lies. But a very subtle and sneaky one jumped out at this humble blogger during the lone debate with his Democratic challenger: he said Americans have no right to a secret ballot:
Grimes stuck to her days-long refusal to say if she voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. She insisted that if she answered the question, it would compromise a constitutional right to cast a secret ballot.
McConnell quickly scoffed at that. Theres no sacred right to not announce how you voted, he said, seated next to Grimes for an hour-long debate hosted by KET, the states public television station.
There is indeed no explicit Constitutional right to a secret ballot: because Boards of Election need to track voters and ballots to prevent fraud. But thats the only place where your right to voting privacy is limited.
But old Jerkle the Turtle goes a step further: not only does he not think you have a right to privacy in the voting booth, he thinks you can be forced to reveal your votes if any old yahoo asks you. This is some truly, scarily insidious, authoritarian, big-government s*** here, folks: Republicans think they can force you to tell them how you voted, and that you have no right to privacy.
Its of a piece with GOP philosophy: they hates them some Fourth Amendment. Repubs think the government should be able to wiretap you, arrest you, torture you, dictate your medical care, and monitor your sex life. So voting rights are likewise non-starters for Big Brother Motherf***ers like McConnell and the rest of his party. Once again, Gentle Reader: Repubs think you have no right to privacy.
We should all of us applaud Ms. Grimes strong stand on privacy, and support her right to not say for whom she voted. This seems obvious, but even some Democrats are saying she should tell us all how she voted. Poppy-f***ing-cock. She has the same privacy rights as the rest of us, and we should all have her back on this issue because we all are in the same boat. Want to be forced to tell your boss how you voted, or your parents, or a news organization? This writer does not, and you shouldnt have to, either.
This election isnt just about candidates, folks: its about our freedom from Big Government Repubs and their NSA-Patriot Act-Morals Police-Brute Squad vision of America. We all need to vote against any candidate who would take away our rights, and support any candidate who supports our rights.
This writer doesn't give a single turd from a tufted titmouse's ass how Ms. Grimes voted. It's her right to keep it private, and good on her for asserting that right.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She has the right not to answer, just as Mittens had the right not to disclose his taxes
onenote
Oct 2014
#122
In my entire life I have never voted for a republican and I am not afraid to tell anyone who asks.
abakan
Oct 2014
#94
aargh. one more time. candidates are not being forced to reveal their voting histories
cali
Oct 2014
#28
She is being criticized for THE WAY SHE ANSWERED, not because she has the right to keep it secret.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#67
Lol, they are not. Just like they don't have to answer any policy question.....
Logical
Oct 2014
#57
There are a great many rights you give up (voluntarily) when you run for office...
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#47
The Republican ads would conveniently cut-off the " . . ., but let me tell you . . ."
branford
Oct 2014
#112
I'm starting to care about who ordered her to distance herself from the President.
LawDeeDah
Oct 2014
#30
Is Reading Comprehension a lost art? MM said explicitly and clearly, "to not ANNOUNCE...."
WinkyDink
Oct 2014
#34
Best answer would be, "Maybe I did, maybe I didn't, and that's the truth".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2014
#49
Wendy Davis became famous for standing in opposition to abortion restrictions...
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#51
I don't see it as relevant. It was a bear trap that she wisely chose not to step into.
riqster
Oct 2014
#82
We can bet she voted Dem. But she isn't obligated to help the Repubs create misleading sound bites.
riqster
Oct 2014
#141
My question was if it was about privacy why did she offer that she was a Clinton Democrat?
IL Lib
Oct 2014
#158
And depressing that so many would rather help Mcconnell win than vote for a Dem.
riqster
Oct 2014
#160
Yep, and I'd take it as an opportunity to rail against both parties on class issues
Hippo_Tron
Oct 2014
#148
Election integrity is not sufficiently prioritized here, or in the nation as a whole.
riqster
Oct 2014
#97
If we have no right to a secret ballot, then why do they have curtains around the booths?
liberal N proud
Oct 2014
#83
Apparently the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is pulling out of Kentucky
kelly1mm
Oct 2014
#100
Reading beyond the headline, riqster.. Alison's campaign is reported to have lots of money and
Cha
Oct 2014
#120
Yeah, she could have told them to mind their own business in a forceful manner.
riqster
Oct 2014
#118
The idea is to champion the principles but mention the brand name as little as possible
Hippo_Tron
Oct 2014
#151
If she didn't vote for Obama, it shows incredibly bad judgement on her part
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#126
If Democrats cringe so much they won't admit to voting Democratic, then they need bashing
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#142