General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: According to your values, is illegally downloading a song, TV show, or movie immoral? [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,448 posts)The fact that the supply is limited only makes the price the author can charge infinitesimally small compared to the effort required to create it.
I can charge tens of thousands of dollars for the single intricate physical table I craft - because whoever buys it gets the enitre benefit of all of the hours I put into crafting it - and we are used to paying for the entire cost of the hours it required to create it.
If I had to charge a reasonable hourly rate for the novel I write, of which there is a single copy, it would never sell because in order to make a living i might need to charge perhaps $20,000 (a year's work at $10/hour). So my time investment is recouped by selling multiple copies at a lower cost. If you replicate my book for your own personal use, you decrease my ability to recover my costs because I have to bump my costs up for the remaining books I need to sell to cover my time investment - and when I bump my costs up, it makes them harder to sell.
If a book (or song) is no longer in print - you are free to find an existing copy and buy it (under the first resale rights). I'm free to let you make a copy - perhaps because I've made back my investment and I just want to share out of the good of my heart. But it is my choice - not yours.
The point isn't that you are depriving the owner of the object - it is that you are depriving the craftsman of payment for his labor. The only difference is that a physical craftsman is paid by a single sale; the intellectual craftsman typically is paid by making multiple sales.