General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel is tearing the Clintons and Panetta a new one [View all]csziggy
(34,189 posts)I've always liked her, in fact I voted for Bill both times because I like Hillary. But in 2008 her campaign took on a Republican negative campaign feel. Rather than keeping with the issues, she tried to trash Obama in irrelevant ways. This rubbed me the wrong way, so I didn't vote for her in the primaries.
Why should she attack a fellow Democrat especially one who will not be running against her? That is demented. There are plenty of flaws in the Republican philosophy to attack, and pretty much an infinite number of problems with any of the potential Republican candidates. The Clintons should stick with attacking them - unless they really agree with Republicans more than they do Democrats?
If she goes this route, I may vote for a third party candidate.