Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
19. Indeed ...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 01:50 PM
Oct 2014
This may be the single most important -- and blatantly honest -- research report released by any official body since the beginning of the Ebola outbreak. The WHO's "Ebola situation assessment" report, found here, explains that only 95% of Ebola infections experience incubation within the widely-reported 21-day period. Here's the actual language from the report:

95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval.

Unless the sentence structure is somehow misleading, this passage appears to indicate the following:

• 95% of Ebola incubations occur from 1 - 21 days
• 3% of Ebola incubations occur from 21 - 42 days
• 2% of Ebola incubations are not explained (why?)

If this interpretation of the WHO's statistics are correct, it would mean that:

• 1 in 20 Ebola infections may result in incubations lasting significantly longer than 21 days

• The 21-day quarantine currently being enforced by the CDC is entirely insufficient to halt an outbreak

• People who are released from observation or self-quarantine after 21 days may still become full-blown Ebola patients in the subsequent three weeks, even if they have shown no symptoms of infection during the first 21 days. (Yes, read that again...)

Any declaration that an outbreak is over requires 42 days with no new infections

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They haven't been. UNMC is equipped and did just fine with an ebola patient. joeglow3 Oct 2014 #1
Yeah, so that's 2 plus the ones who handled the potential RiffRandell Oct 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #2
Because of that boneheaded move, I bet they will change rules at TSA. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #7
Now the incubation time is known to be as long as 42 days. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #16
Indeed ... In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #19
Thank you for this. 840high Oct 2014 #29
You're welcome. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #39
2% can't be determined...why? Because the patient can't be connected to a specific exposure HereSince1628 Oct 2014 #47
The unknown is scary stuff. How can new Ebola cases be stopped in the 2%? In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #51
Really, that 2% may not be different than any others... HereSince1628 Oct 2014 #52
That explanation sounds a whole lot better than simply Unknown. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #53
No kidding...wtf? RiffRandell Oct 2014 #8
She wasn't supposed to have been flying commercial airline. LisaL Oct 2014 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #48
Yeah...listening to a local press conference now Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #45
Good. nt City Lights Oct 2014 #3
Good. THP has failed miserably. ecstatic Oct 2014 #4
About fucking time B2G Oct 2014 #5
Good--TX Presbyterian is a clusterfuck. TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #6
How can that be when their CEO made over $5.7 million a year? KeepItReal Oct 2014 #33
It's mind boggling... deutsey Oct 2014 #41
Closing the barn doors after the horse is already gone? LisaL Oct 2014 #9
There are two showing symptoms, and they are each isolated. morningfog Oct 2014 #21
One of those two flew to another state just before showing in the hospital with symptoms. LisaL Oct 2014 #23
And she was not infectious at that time. No one was infected by that travel. morningfog Oct 2014 #24
There you are, making statements you can not possibly have any evidence for. LisaL Oct 2014 #25
There you are sowing idiotic fear. You think you would have learned by now. morningfog Oct 2014 #27
Aren't you the one who claimed nobody got infected by Mr. Duncan? LisaL Oct 2014 #28
Am I wrong or are they have 4 others on a real tight watch boston bean Oct 2014 #49
That is not consistent with the information from the CDC. Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #46
Well, I certainly don't want them to give up in frustration. HereSince1628 Oct 2014 #54
And this nurse flew the day before being diagnosed adigal Oct 2014 #11
Add OH to that list. LisaL Oct 2014 #18
LOL. morningfog Oct 2014 #26
You are clueless. LisaL Oct 2014 #31
I just heard that. Unbelieveable. RiffRandell Oct 2014 #32
For known contacts of Ebola patients, she shouldn't have been flying at all. LisaL Oct 2014 #34
Oh, I agree. RiffRandell Oct 2014 #35
And I promise you, no one on that plane was infected by her. morningfog Oct 2014 #38
You can not possibly promise me something that you haven't got a faintest clue about. LisaL Oct 2014 #40
I absolutely assure you. morningfog Oct 2014 #42
Your assurances are worth nothing to me. LisaL Oct 2014 #43
I guarantee it. morningfog Oct 2014 #44
It is unlikely that anyone was infected, Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #50
She shouldn't have been flying at all, while she was being monitored as Mr. Duncan's contact. LisaL Oct 2014 #55
I agree completely. Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #57
She was already symptomatic. LisaL Oct 2014 #61
I think Emory is one of the 4 units in the states that are equipped for this severe a problem. jwirr Oct 2014 #12
There's one here in Maryland. I believe that it is Bethesda Naval Hospital, which is literally amandabeech Oct 2014 #36
It's about time they started doing this. Not all hospitals are equal.... Little Star Oct 2014 #14
Emory, Nebraska somewhere, and two others have the biosafety units set up for kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #15
Could be? LisaL Oct 2014 #22
Perhaps she could get a sight-seeing tour while she's in town... Earth_First Oct 2014 #17
Yep. LisaL Oct 2014 #20
Finally! Something makes sense! mfcorey1 Oct 2014 #37
I see no info on this Lurker Deluxe Oct 2014 #56
First item from your link: City Lights Oct 2014 #58
Has Dr. Brantly donated plasma for HER yet? kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #59
Quite possibly he isn't a match for her. LisaL Oct 2014 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Second Ebola Infected Nur...»Reply #19