Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Second Ebola Infected Nurse is Being Flown to Emory Today. [View all]In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)19. Indeed ...
This may be the single most important -- and blatantly honest -- research report released by any official body since the beginning of the Ebola outbreak. The WHO's "Ebola situation assessment" report, found here, explains that only 95% of Ebola infections experience incubation within the widely-reported 21-day period. Here's the actual language from the report:
95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval.
Unless the sentence structure is somehow misleading, this passage appears to indicate the following:
95% of Ebola incubations occur from 1 - 21 days
3% of Ebola incubations occur from 21 - 42 days
2% of Ebola incubations are not explained (why?)
If this interpretation of the WHO's statistics are correct, it would mean that:
1 in 20 Ebola infections may result in incubations lasting significantly longer than 21 days
The 21-day quarantine currently being enforced by the CDC is entirely insufficient to halt an outbreak
People who are released from observation or self-quarantine after 21 days may still become full-blown Ebola patients in the subsequent three weeks, even if they have shown no symptoms of infection during the first 21 days. (Yes, read that again...)
Any declaration that an outbreak is over requires 42 days with no new infections
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
2% can't be determined...why? Because the patient can't be connected to a specific exposure
HereSince1628
Oct 2014
#47
One of those two flew to another state just before showing in the hospital with symptoms.
LisaL
Oct 2014
#23
And she was not infectious at that time. No one was infected by that travel.
morningfog
Oct 2014
#24
You can not possibly promise me something that you haven't got a faintest clue about.
LisaL
Oct 2014
#40
She shouldn't have been flying at all, while she was being monitored as Mr. Duncan's contact.
LisaL
Oct 2014
#55
I think Emory is one of the 4 units in the states that are equipped for this severe a problem.
jwirr
Oct 2014
#12
There's one here in Maryland. I believe that it is Bethesda Naval Hospital, which is literally
amandabeech
Oct 2014
#36
Emory, Nebraska somewhere, and two others have the biosafety units set up for
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#15