General Discussion

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)

47. Very telling:

Wed Oct 15, 2014, 03:45 PM

Oct 2014

“We believe that applying the statute so that its reach into our homes and personal relationships is inconsistent with (its) wording and intent.”

(emphasis added)

They want to continue to abuse their domestic partners without fear of SYG getting in their way. I wonder if he realizes how revealing this is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

South Carolina Prosecutors Say Stand Your Ground Doesn�t Apply To Victims Of Domestic Violence [View all] babylonsister Oct 2014 OP

Inconceivable, Ma'am The Magistrate Oct 2014 #1

I hear you, my friend, and am appalled. Seems inhuman to me. nt babylonsister Oct 2014 #2

They really don't consider women citizens csziggy Oct 2014 #4

True. This has always been their view. freshwest Oct 2014 #8

Excellent point And it is true. We're not citizens. littlemissmartypants Oct 2014 #68

Just so. Tenthers don't accept women's suffrage, much less equality. riqster Oct 2014 #27

It's pretty much "Stand Your Ground is for men only...and by 'men' I mean 'white men'". Ken Burch Oct 2014 #41

Bingo! n/t FourScore Oct 2014 #67

Makes me wonder if these "officials" are worried about their spouse standing their ground on them. kairos12 Oct 2014 #42

Truly sickening. TDale313 Oct 2014 #3

Absolutely disgusting. nt Mnemosyne Oct 2014 #5

Why don't they just come out and say it only applies to white males. bullwinkle428 Oct 2014 #6

It sure would make them look less stupid wouldn't it? jen63 Oct 2014 #9

You beat me to it. + infinity stevenleser Oct 2014 #15

+1 uponit7771 Oct 2014 #26

+1 Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #39

^^This!^^ BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #43

You nailed it! burrowowl Oct 2014 #61

paranoid white males Skittles Oct 2014 #65

Damn. Solly Mack Oct 2014 #7

Good thing prosecutors aren't the final authority on when SYG applies. aikoaiko Oct 2014 #10

No discussion of SYG should be complete w/o reminding everyone that Jeb Bush was a major FSogol Oct 2014 #11

Hell's bells his LAST NAME should serve as a hifiguy Oct 2014 #32

Didn't know that about ol' Jeb. But not surprised. No, not at all. blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #44

So even if a woman isn't living with her abuser justiceischeap Oct 2014 #12

Tell me again how there's no war on women. malthaussen Oct 2014 #13

+1000 theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #17

Though I have questioned SYG as it appears to apply to one subset of folk "allowed" to SYG etherealtruth Oct 2014 #28

Wish I could say I was surprised. SYG is for white, straight, men to shoot "the other" where stevenleser Oct 2014 #14

+1 hifiguy Oct 2014 #33

Agreed. No accident AT ALL. nt stevenleser Oct 2014 #38

not surprising heaven05 Oct 2014 #16

Disgusting. /nt yardwork Oct 2014 #18

Essentially: no castle, no doctrine. eom Bad Thoughts Oct 2014 #19

By the letter of the law Lee-Lee Oct 2014 #20

article implies SYG generally is inapplicable to women in abusive relationships. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #25

Yep. +1 nt stevenleser Oct 2014 #37

Really? The Jungle 1 Oct 2014 #50

you may have a point, were it true that the cops actually gave a shit redruddyred Oct 2014 #51

Wait ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #21

A woman is killed every 12 days? BobbyBoring Oct 2014 #22

because current policing methods don't work. redruddyred Oct 2014 #52

Cops don't understand shit, period. blackspade Oct 2014 #59

Considering that cops have a high rate of abusers among their tblue37 Oct 2014 #71

how do these people sleep at night? Takket Oct 2014 #23

^ n/t BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #24

Will someone please explain the last sentence in the OP to me? Jenoch Oct 2014 #29

Since that's not possible, babylonsister Oct 2014 #35

You even got it wrong. Jenoch Oct 2014 #36

No, dear, you're reading babylonsister Oct 2014 #40

The problem is that the subject of the sentence Jenoch Oct 2014 #57

the problem isn't punishment, rather scaring these guys enough to keep them from redruddyred Oct 2014 #54

South Carolina protect women? lark Oct 2014 #30

There was a detailed article on SC's problems dealing with domestic violence a while back n2doc Oct 2014 #31

now I have heard it all strawberries Oct 2014 #34

How much longer can it be until the Republican Party pushes for women wearing burqas, blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #45

"prosecutor" his job is to make anyone a criminal...it's what he does. ileus Oct 2014 #46

That should be ... blackspade Oct 2014 #60

Very telling: Sheldon Cooper Oct 2014 #47

how much you wanna bet that redruddyred Oct 2014 #55

Exactly. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2014 #56

Good Gawd, how vulcan shameless can you get? Darb Oct 2014 #48

The Legislature's Intent with SWG was to Declare Open Season on Minorities AndyTiedye Oct 2014 #49

The Law should be written so it is clear who and what is covered. sammy750 Oct 2014 #53

Kidd sounds like an abusing prick protecting himself. blackspade Oct 2014 #58

Obviously horrible jeffrey_pdx Oct 2014 #62

I think it should be taken one step further and used MontyPow Oct 2014 #63

What the fuck? n/t bvf Oct 2014 #64

while pointing his gun at several teens he called �women thugs.� IronLionZion Oct 2014 #66

Let's try that one out on the SCOTUS. jwirr Oct 2014 #69

Culver Kidd is a corrupt piece of shit, no doubt. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #70