Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama has secured 526 months of prison for national security leakers, 20x all previous presidents [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)32. Laws are being deliberately changed to suppress dissent and criminalize journalism.
US Uses Espionage Act To Convict Manning Using Words Added In 1990: "with a computer"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023375845
Fed Court: Just changed interpretation of Espionage Act to cover leaks that are NOT Harmful To USA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023365713
NY Times: White House Uses Espionage Act to Silence Employees, Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101616764
Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023080388
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023375845
Fed Court: Just changed interpretation of Espionage Act to cover leaks that are NOT Harmful To USA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023365713
NY Times: White House Uses Espionage Act to Silence Employees, Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101616764
Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023080388
Mission creep. The definitions of "espionage" and "terror" are being actively expanded to the point that journalists and political enemies can now be smeared and dealt with as though they were spies and terrorists. Yes, it's the behavior of a totalitarian state legalizing the oppression it chooses to legalize and criminalizing behaviors that have previously been specifically protected under the Constitution. Sort of like relabeling any male of a certain age who is blasted to smithereens by a drone "an enemy combatant."
Another great Orwellian example is the government's ongoing attempt to give itself the power to define who is and isn't a journalist. What better way to claim to establish "protections" for whistleblowers, when what you are actually doing is creating categories through which you can exclude from protection those you don't want to protect.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023708417
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4976955
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4976082
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4976955
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama has secured 526 months of prison for national security leakers, 20x all previous presidents [View all]
DesMoinesDem
Oct 2014
OP
"if you prosecute a CEO or other senior executive and send him or her to jail
red dog 1
Oct 2014
#42
I could tell you, but everyone knows that you can get tombstoned just for defending the president!
Doctor_J
Oct 2014
#34
It's under, "Committed the US to war in Afghanistan for another decade," if that helps. nt
OnyxCollie
Oct 2014
#56
Did saying Obama jailed almost 3x more than all President's combined not work?
JoePhilly
Oct 2014
#4
Journalism? James Risen became famous for smearing Wen Ho Lee. And Judith Miller
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#19
Laws are being deliberately changed to suppress dissent and criminalize journalism.
woo me with science
Oct 2014
#32
No one disputed that Judith Miller should go to jail for the exact same thing James Risen is
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#13
No...the law does not recognize this purported difference. And the person Mr. Risen
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#38
But the law does not recognize political affiliation as a defense. Nor should it. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#48
Miller didn't operate in a vacuum. And clearly Fitzgerald, DUers, and the judge knew it
riderinthestorm
Oct 2014
#52
This thread has been designated "doubleplusungood" and is predictably being swarmed
woo me with science
Oct 2014
#27