Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
110. no one is talking about that - it's his treatment we're talking about
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:00 PM
Oct 2014

Yep, the hospital fucked up in sending him home. And that should have been a HUGE clue that they were not at all prepared. True, Mr. Duncan could have been more forthcoming and told them that he suspected he had Ebola and that he had been in direct contact with someone who had it rather than only saying he was form Liberia or West Africa. Obviously those places didn't ring any bells for anyone in the ER to clue them in that he might have Ebola. That's not what's at issue here.

Once they admitted him they knew what he likely had. We're talking about their ability to care for him properly while protecting the staff, hospital patients and visitors etc. And it was the CDC that assured them that they could and that it was no problem while paying no attention to what the hell was going on there so they could be told, no, you can't do dialysis or ventilate an Ebola patient, no, you can't put samples through the tube system, no, you can't have so many people taking care of him with their also taking care of other patients, no you can't have staff suiting up their own selves without supervision or have them take off their PPE without disinfecting it first, etc., etc., etc. That's the CDC's JOB. THEY are the ones hospitals are to go to for direction, protocols and HELP to make sure that what's being done every step of the way is done correctly.

The very fact that Frieden believed that Mr. Duncan could be handled just fine in a regular hospital with a biosafety level 4 virus and level 2 protocols is ludicrous. It's willful negligence. The CDC KNOWS that Ebola is a biosafety level 4 virus, so why on earth did they not have Mr. Duncan sent to one of the 4 hospitals that were designed to handle it just like they did all the AMERICAN patients that were infected and were sent to those hospitals?

We have these hospitals for a REASON - because regular hospitals are not set up with the appropriate experienced staff in infrastructure to handle a biosafety level 4 infected patient just like all hospitals don't have a special burn unit or special trauma unit. Our health care system is already set up such that certain people with certain severe illnesses/injuries need to receive care at certain hospitals set up to be able to handle their certain issue even if that means they need to be flown to another city or another state.

For example, none of the hospitals here in the suburbs have a burn unit. Years ago someone had an accident where their car ended up catching on fire and they had severe burns. The accident happened practically in the parking lot of one of our area hospitals, but it wasn't equipped to handle someone with such severe burns on so much of his body. The EMT's were well aware of that and medivaced him to one of the city hospitals that has an excellent burn unit. The chopper came down right in the middle of the street. The fire department cut open his car to get him out, and the EMT's whisked him into the chopper. It happened right outside my apartment building, but I wasn't home at the time and had to read all about it in the papers the next few days. Big full page spreads on the front page (this was before internet). Someone even got a good photo of the chopper just touching down in the street when it arrived with cop cars everywhere blocking off the whole street with lights whirling and flares burning. Must have been something to see - our first responders doing an excellent job of trying to save someone's life. Never found out what happened to the victim after that - nobody ever followed up to see if he lived or died or what.

And it makes sense to do it that way. Every hospital couldn't afford to have a special burn unit, a special trauma center, a special children's unit or a special biosafety level 4 unit because they don't all need them for the areas they cover. Most of the time those special units would be empty with special staff twiddling their thumbs having no patient to service and increase their experience.

So far the four biosafety level 4 hospitals the US with a total of 19 beds between them have been plenty to serve the needs of patients requiring that level of care throughout the country since this country just doesn't get much in the way of patients with that sort of infection that needs that level of care. We just don't have outbreaks of Ebola, Marburg, Lassa fever and or other hemorrhagic fevers or the few certain encephalitis infections that are the only ones on the list of biosafety level 4 - it's a short list. Most of the time those beds are probably empty or we fly in people from other countries needing that level of care who don't have that sort of care level. Good practice for the staff anyway, and why not help someone in need from another country that doesn't have the means to care for them. It just doesn't make sense for all of our country's hospitals to have ana scant number of patients who need it while most of the time those units would be empty.

Our medical system is designed to be so excellent and modern that these special hospitals would be all that's needed to care for an outbreak should we get on and stop it in its tracks there. None of the BSL-4 viruses are airborne... it's not like flu season where thousands and thousands are affected. In this country and most any other first world country these few BSL-4 viruses are so rare we basically don't get them, period.

For cripes sake, if I know all this than surely the CDC does, too, and one hell of a lot more. So, why the HELL did they not send Mr. Duncan to one of the four hospitals with the environment, staff, equipment, etc. to not only care for him but STOP EBOLA FROM SPREADING.

Thanks to the utter willful negligence of the CDC we now have a minor outbreak that could grow far worse to a point where we CAN'T handle it because our regular hospitals with regular environment, equipment and staff CAN't handle. And they still haven't woken up to the fact that after screwing up so badly gambling with peoples' lives they need to get their heads out of their asses and send these two infected workers to one of our four BSL-4 level hospital for care and to stop more infection spread from those two. Anyone else that becomes infected by the cluster-fuck at the Dallas hospital also needs to be sent to those hospitals so they can stop the infection from spreading. The Dallas hospital caring for these two infected workers is GOING to continue to screw up with more people getting infected caring for THEM.

Has the CDC sent in a special team to care for them since they made that decision? If not, why not? Will that team have what it requires in everything they need to do? Is the makeshift ICU now set up to be able to be contained and can it be with negative airflow and separate waste containment and disposal? It STILL doesn't make any sense to not have these two other workers sent to where they need to go to ensure infection from THEIR care doesn't continue to spread.

This minor outbreak is the fault of the CDC for assuring the Dallas hospital they could successfully care for an Ebola patient when they HAD to know they couldn't. It's their JOB to know. It's their JOB to have correct protocols and correct environment and staff with the experience and training to handle a BSL-4 infected patient. It's their JOB to be on hand to monitor and supervise everything that goes on to stop any mistakes before they happen and to make sure things are done as properly as they can be because it's their JOB to be the go-to agency of the country for everything about infectious disease, preparedness and containment. And now we find out the hard way that the head of this agency is an inept bureaucratic ninny without a clue that for no reason is gambling with peoples' lives and CAUSING an outbreak with his ineptitude when everything would have been fine had he just sent Mr. Duncan to one of the four BSL-4 hospitals just as all the infected AMERICANS were. And for that he not only needs to be fired but put in jail for willfully putting lives at risk for infection of a deadly incurable disease, and OF COURSE that happened.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think he should go. He had WAYYYY too much faith in regular hospitals' ability to TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #1
WTF? So the head of the CDC should do what exactly? Inspect every single hospital in the USA? KittyWampus Oct 2014 #11
No, he should have sent an all-hands-on-deck response team to oversee TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #18
Exactly... +1 Historic NY Oct 2014 #22
Then why did we know all about it in Connecticut? Atman Oct 2014 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #54
Again ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #56
+1B magical thyme Oct 2014 #117
No mcar Oct 2014 #2
+++++++ still_one Oct 2014 #4
+1 hedgehog Oct 2014 #15
The one doesn't rule out the other. Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #46
Duncan should have been removed from that hospital ASAP and send into one of the 4 hospitals LisaL Oct 2014 #3
You repeatedly spout the same crap over and over. It isn't the CDC's fault that HOSPITALS KittyWampus Oct 2014 #10
Whose fault is that Ebola patient flew from Cleveland to Dallas on Monday? LisaL Oct 2014 #16
Whose fault? Jim Beard Oct 2014 #75
The hospital administrators and the Republican CDC budget-cutting Congress should be fired sketchy Oct 2014 #5
What YOU said! ^^^^^. . . . n/t annabanana Oct 2014 #48
No. But every hospital administrator in the country who has dropped the ball and failed to get their kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #6
No Marrah_G Oct 2014 #7
FFS, the CDC is in place to help with information, logistics, organization. KittyWampus Oct 2014 #8
Frieden Could Have Sent A Team Sooner erpowers Oct 2014 #64
Yes. Immediately and concurrent with the firing of the hospital administrator. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2014 #9
Second Ebola patient flew from Cleveland to Dallas the day before she showed up in the hospital. LisaL Oct 2014 #12
People who work with sick patients still have civil rights. alarimer Oct 2014 #19
No, it's fine and dandy to travel all over the country while infected with Ebola. LisaL Oct 2014 #20
she wasnt considered one that day VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #28
After first nurse was diagnosed, CDC said all of those who cared for Mr. Duncan LisaL Oct 2014 #34
so how many do you want in these Ebola VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #37
Per CDC director, this woman wasn't supposed to have been traveling on commercial airline. LisaL Oct 2014 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #53
SHE wasnt quaratined.....and that is exactly VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #92
I heard it, too. 840high Oct 2014 #39
She may have been infected, but she was not infectious. morningfog Oct 2014 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #63
SHE wasnt quaratined....she was being observed.. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #97
apparently that is NOT the case.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #105
Of course you don't....then you wouldn't have anything to be outraged about! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #106
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #107
That may well be so....and I keep saying over and over....we have to take into account... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #108
Which you can not possibly know. LisaL Oct 2014 #67
yes qe DO know....you are not contagious until VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #30
Could you afford to spend three weeks with no income? Fumesucker Oct 2014 #35
It's better to spread Ebola all over the country, I suppose. LisaL Oct 2014 #43
By what law is that. Jim Beard Oct 2014 #77
Per CDC, this woman shouldn't have been flying. LisaL Oct 2014 #86
The Executive in her city, county, state and nationally all have inherent police power for quarantin AngryAmish Oct 2014 #99
Can you afford to die and or spread disease? 840high Oct 2014 #44
I'm trying to describe reality as lot of Americans experience it Fumesucker Oct 2014 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #73
Then maybe we should consider turning efforts to keep ebola OUT in the first place, up to "11" Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #118
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #52
What makes you think they would be paid? Fumesucker Oct 2014 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #62
Nurses are threatened with termination if they don't come to work when sick Fumesucker Oct 2014 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #72
.... 840high Oct 2014 #70
Silly. Quarantines do not violate any civil right that I know of. AngryAmish Oct 2014 #98
surprised DustyJoe Oct 2014 #80
I think I can wait until we know how we did... Johonny Oct 2014 #13
Because what we need right now is not only the Surgeon General post vacant NuclearDem Oct 2014 #14
Exactly what I was thinkin'. jen63 Oct 2014 #83
NO. Holy shit people this is not a blame game! Avalux Oct 2014 #17
Agree. There is no perfect procedure. There is no guarantee that kiranon Oct 2014 #23
When bedside nurses say, as a group, "we are not prepared for this", someone best TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #32
They didn't speak up until it was in their back yard. Avalux Oct 2014 #81
And replace him with whom? Someone new to the crisis? mainer Oct 2014 #21
He absolutely... onyourleft Oct 2014 #24
Yes, because he keeps giving everyone ebola. Iggo Oct 2014 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #27
Those nurses weren't "allowed" to care for other patients Fumesucker Oct 2014 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #51
I want to see his ass in a sling TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #33
no one is talking about that - it's his treatment we're talking about TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #110
The CDC DID NOT TREAT ANYONE. KittyWampus Oct 2014 #42
CDC was charge of monitoring Mr. Duncan's contacts. LisaL Oct 2014 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #58
Yet, the CDC cleared the nurse to fly. philosslayer Oct 2014 #109
Plus 1000. Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #65
^^this^^ Puzzledtraveller Oct 2014 #87
Good questions... marions ghost Oct 2014 #96
I agree. The CDC has been telling us for months that "we're ready for ebola". Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #114
No. Blue_Roses Oct 2014 #31
We desperately need a Surgeon General in place. Lars39 Oct 2014 #38
What would a Surgeon General do YarnAddict Oct 2014 #88
At the very least be the face and mouthpiece, allowing the CDC to concentrate Lars39 Oct 2014 #90
George's Bush's Jim Beard Oct 2014 #91
I think he's our "Heckuva job Bownie". Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #41
They've even said themselves that they've "dropped the ball", now, twice I think. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #112
I think the blame falls on this hospital. Vinca Oct 2014 #47
Yes, but this is a national concern. If that hospital was the only thing standing in between apples and oranges Oct 2014 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #60
Decision was made to leave Mr. Duncan in the hospital. LisaL Oct 2014 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #68
I don't know if he would or wouldn't have survived. LisaL Oct 2014 #71
You are 100% correct. This is Texas Jim Beard Oct 2014 #82
Or maybe we could have done what some of us have been saying for months, and restrict entry to Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #113
Yes. I could have done a better job, quite frankly. He can be a spokesperson apples and oranges Oct 2014 #49
yes Puzzledtraveller Oct 2014 #55
No Kalidurga Oct 2014 #74
No riverwalker Oct 2014 #76
Agree etherealtruth Oct 2014 #79
Oh Lawd Jeebus! Tarheel_Dem Oct 2014 #78
no mikehiggins Oct 2014 #84
No Tweedy Oct 2014 #85
No, I think that sort of thing is for show treestar Oct 2014 #93
Exactly right. GoCubsGo Oct 2014 #116
If we had single payer health care locks Oct 2014 #100
I think he's become complacent in his position notadmblnd Oct 2014 #101
I doubt he micromanages to that extent. Warpy Oct 2014 #102
maybe he should be demoted to answering the phones ctaylors6 Oct 2014 #103
Why? He's doing a heckuva job, isn't he? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #111
Yes, he sure does. LisaL Oct 2014 #115
Fer fucks sake MattBaggins Oct 2014 #119
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Center for Disease...»Reply #110