Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
10. Another great article on the subject.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 11:23 AM
Oct 2014
Cross posted from Appalachia Group

Recommended read!

https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/24923-helping-people-in-coal-country-as-the-nation-divests-from-carbon.html
Helping People in “Coal Country” as the Nation Divests from Carbon
Written by Rick Cohen
Friday, 03 October 2014

In the wake of increasingly successful divestment actions aimed at carbon-producing industries, coal has turned into the new tobacco. While even natural gas mining has its vocal supporters despite the dangers of fracking, the supporters of coal are shrinking as the “clean coal” touted by candidates of both political parties looks more and more like an oxymoron.

But what about the people who live in coal country? What is happening to them as the institutional investors withdraw their assets from the companies topping the Carbon 200 list? As institutional investors including foundations pull their assets out of coal, are foundations and others dealing with the impacts on the populations of Appalachian communities and other places?

AP writers Adam Beam and John Raby wrote last week about the closing of mines in Eastern Kentucky and West Virginia, historically one of the poorest regions of the U.S., and the shrinkage of their public school populations. Because school funding typically tracks school populations, the loss of students due to families moving out of coal country means that schools in places like Pike County, Kentucky, and McDowell County, West Virginia are hard pressed to provide quality educational programming or even stay open. Beam and Raby reported on children in these rural communities facing longer and longer bus rides to and from school.

“Except for moving, there’s not a lot that can been done,” they write, and that’s part of the problem. Many people are fleeing coal country because of the lack of jobs and opportunity. As major national philanthropies cut back on or eliminate their rural grantmaking programs, the message, subliminal or otherwise, that some foundations are sending to these rural families is similar: If you want to improve your lives, pack up, get a bus ticket to a big city, and move.... MORE at link provided above.
This is so true: Ykcutnek Oct 2014 #1
Thank you for this post. theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #3
Yep. Big Coal's influence is here to stay. Ykcutnek Oct 2014 #6
$$$$$ talks. theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #9
Another great article on the subject. theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #10
A related article on how this is affecting education in the region theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #11
I have also heard . . . Brigid Oct 2014 #2
If you keep people mired in poverty... theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #4
I am OUTRAGED over Blair Mountain, too. theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #5
Yes, they have managed that quite well. Ykcutnek Oct 2014 #7
Oh yes, and it's very well funded theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #8
Here's that article to which I referred theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #12
Kicking theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appalachian transition: W...»Reply #10