Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama's solution to Ebola crisis doesn't make any sense [View all]uppityperson
(116,022 posts)22. I will address 3 points here. Please consider them.
3) Sending our troops over there is also unwise since it will be much more likely the disease will spread over here when the troops return.
The areas of the outbreaks are severely understaffed, under equipped to deal with what is going on. They need people to build more hospitals, even field hospitals since there is not enough for those sick with eobola, much less people with other health care needs. I suggest you read these articles to learn more as learning is good.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/with-ebola-crippling-the-health-system-liberians-die-of-routine-medical-problems/2014/09/20/727dcfbe-400b-11e4-b03f-de718edeb92f_story.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/ebola-outbreak-pregnant-women_n_5901816.html
They need not only facilities but health care to care for the sick as well as equipment and supplies not only for the ill but to keep the caregivers safe. They also need people to educate as many there do not believe in ebola, in viruses, in what is needed to keep themselves safe. And they need people to keep those educators and health care people safe.
They need more people and money, much much much more. If they can get the epidemic under control there, there will be less chance of it spreading elsewhere.
The troops being sent are going to be working on infrastructure, building hospitals and the like. They will not be caregiving, which is very risky and has resulted in a high percentage of those infected.
2nd point.
an alternative idea might be to quarantine American travelers for about a month before they are allowed to fly back here.
Where is there a facility to quarantine all Americans who fly into the USA? What about people from other countries? No quarantine, just let them in because....I have no clue why. This makes no sense to me. If you would explain more, it might help.
3rd point.
putting a ban on airplanes coming here from West Africa
There are no airplanes coming to the USA from West Africa. Why put a ban in place for something that does not exist?
You edited this part out which is good because communicable diseases do not respect borders, skin color, nationality.
We have enough problems over here in this country to deal with, along with ISIS threat, rather than feeling the need to take care of the whole planet.
What is happening in this outbreak is awful for those in that part of the world and has been ignored for too long. Now that our country has a case, with a couple more from that original one, interest is picking up in noticing and hopefully soon to help where it is the worse. Not because those in power in the world care about those afflicted, but because now it is here. This is not about just "taking care of the whole planet", though morally every country that could SHOULD have been helping, but because it directly affects this country.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you are going to restrict the travel of people based soley on where they were born?
Thor_MN
Oct 2014
#17
Yes. I am perfectly willing to jerk my knee and be hysterical for as long as this
amandabeech
Oct 2014
#20
Consider what the US would do if Russia decided to shut down travel to/from the US.
Thor_MN
Oct 2014
#21
Anybody who has been to a hot zone since the outbreak should be restricted until the
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#92
Nigeria did it. Argentina told the HCW she was not allowed to disembark.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#99
Apparently, you are ignorant of the fact that there are no flights from the affected countries to
Thor_MN
Oct 2014
#107
For starters have the US embassy in the effected countries stop issuing visas to the US.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#112
Your argument (along with others) is that it would be hard to do and would not be perfect
hugo_from_TN
Oct 2014
#110
What is selfish about restricting travel from places with a disease outbreak?
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#114
Which seems to prove that only involuntary isolation / restriction will suffice. nt
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#93
You are okay with stranding people in Africa that don't live there? For how long?
LawDeeDah
Oct 2014
#7
Which Brings Up My Question - Is There A Similar Ebola Panic Going On In Europe As Here?.......
global1
Oct 2014
#35
I heard that 35 countries have already banned flights from infected countries
pathansen
Oct 2014
#55
That does not say 35 countries have banned flights from infected countries.
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#88
Since Ebola isn't a crisis, and ISIS isn't a threat, I wouldn't worry too much.
arcane1
Oct 2014
#13
There are no planes coming here from West Africa. So banning them wouldn't do Jack.
Thor_MN
Oct 2014
#14
Just in case...you are joining in my sarcasm, right? because there aren't any flights
DebJ
Oct 2014
#77
Yes, you replied to my post saying that there are no flights from the affected countries to the US.
Thor_MN
Oct 2014
#79
The media scares dopes ... and so the government should do what the dopes want?
JoePhilly
Oct 2014
#94
Working to stop the epidemic where it is coming from is not helping to stop the spread of
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#30
I agree, he has not committed enough troops, supplies, money, to W Africa. Excuse me for wrongly
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#44
Next you'll say this is all part of "Obama's Kenyan (black) plot against (white) americans !!11!"
PSPS
Oct 2014
#33
What actions? "just calling for a worldwide travel ban on passengers from West Africa" will do nothi
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#45
I remember when Republican Ronald Reagan sat in the White House and watched 20,000 Americans
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2014
#97
You are correct. And believe me, Democrats will lose BIG TIME in this election if Ebola spreads!
pathansen
Oct 2014
#59
What did an actual Republican President do when faced with a new and deadly virus in America?
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2014
#96
I agree that they should have sent more aid, more help, wayyyy before this to help contain the
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#32
Again. thank you for the easy to understand example of why banning flights won't work.
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#82