Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)ASYMMETRY OF MISINFORMATION: From Krugman To GMOs [View all]
http://fafdl.org/blog/2014/09/10/asymmetry-of-misinformation/A recent Paul Krugman post describes how critics of Obamacare stay misinformed, not always through incorrect information, but rather what is emphasized in the reporting that they see and what is left out.
But theres something Ive noticed from the combination of reactions to what I write and researching past coverage of Obamacare. It goes like this: a lot of the untrue beliefs people have about Obamacare come not so much from outright false reporting as from selective reporting. Every suggestion of bad news gets highlighted especially, of course, but not only by Fox, the WSJ, etc.. But when it turns out that the news wasnt really that bad, these sources just move on. There are claims that millions of people are losing coverage headlines! When it turns out not to be true crickets! Some experts claim that premiums will rise by double digits big news! Actual premium numbers come in and theyre surprisingly low not mentioned. The result is that most news consumers who form impressions rather than trying to work out details have the sense that its been all bad news.
It seemed an apt and parallel description to the asymmetry of information in the two discrete ecosystems of information around the GMO issue.
While Anti-Anti-GMO folks tend to be aware of the information that the other side is looking at, that is rarely the case going in the other direction. The science community spends a great deal of time debunking the poorly conducted studies that are trumpeted and over-interpreted in Sustainablepulse, GreenMedInfo, the Organic Consumers Association, Food Democracy and the various GMO Free websites. So we are aware of what is being circulated in the anti-GMO community. The folks who read those sites are often not even aware that an alternative ecosystem of information exists. They frequently dont realize that the studies they are circulating have been roundly critiqued, if not completely discredited. They continue to circulate things like the 2009 editorial by Scientific American on the ability of independent researchers to access biotech seeds without realizing that the issue has been resolved. They often continue to believe things like the urban myth that biotech crops employ the terminator technology. Readers of RT.com often believe that China is giving up on biotech crops, because they have rejected select shipments with crops they have yet to approve or that they have abandoned some research trials. This is seen as evidence of some safety issue with biotech crops, rather than leverage in trade policy and the fact that research trials are ended all the time when they dont bear the results that had been hoped for. People who get all their news from anti-GMO sources rarely understand that there is a lot of research on biotech safety, much of it by independent sources.
..."
Alas, the piece is all too short, but it is well supported at the same site.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 2442 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council support my position,
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#15