General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kicking down and kissing up: Signs of a classic authoritarian [View all]True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Blaming someone for problems that frighten the public is more entertaining, more dramatic than rationally seeking and assessing facts, and "that is the whole of the law" as far as these pseudo-informative organizations are concerned. Moreover, blaming defenseless ordinary people is simply easier and more relatable to the audience than adding to the din of anti-intitutional commentary.
Facts are merely hooks to sell the narrative they find most profitable, and are rarely essential to that narrative, let alone helpful to the audience. It cannot be overstated how degenerate the news media has become.
So to call those corrupt news organizations "authoritarian" would be giving them too much credit. They are not even conscious enough to be capable of such a political ideology. At this point in history, they are mere entertainers, and the "news" they sell about ebola is no different from horror TV shows and movies about epidemics - it's a product tailored to make you watch, nothing more. They have no interest in or knowledge of their own content deeper than that. It might as well be algorithm-generated content for all it resembles reality or even conscious propaganda.
What you're seeing is corruption, laziness, degeneracy. Authoritarianism would be too structured a motive to ascribe to these people. They are nihilistic, and only go after the weak because it's easier, not because they are awed by power.