Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
15. Because it worked out ok one other time is not a solid basis for a theory or claim
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 06:17 AM
Oct 2014

A sample size of one when determining anything is useless.

One time I saw a person get into a horrific auto accident where the car flipped 4 times after hitting a tree- and the woman walked away. She had a blood alcohol level of .10 and wasn't wearing a seatbelt. Another time I saw a man drive with a .15 and make it 7 miles to his driveway without crashing. I don't go advocate driving drunk based off these accounts, which would be the equivalent of your logic of "these two times people were close to an infected person and were ok, so nobody should worry".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To put the risk to passen...»Reply #15