General Discussion

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)

93. Who said there had to be profit in the schools?

Fri Oct 17, 2014, 09:53 AM

Oct 2014

Lots of private schools are not run for profit. The important issue is which school will provide children with the best education.

Would you choose to send your kids to a crappy, inner-city public school over a great private school just because the private school was a for profit school? I wouldn't and I doubt many parents would either. I have no problem with a public school being available provided it was funded. at least in substantial part, by tuition paid by the attending students. Such a school would have to provide quality or parents would send their kids elsehwhere and it would close. What I see as grossly unfair is a situation where parents can't afford a private school after paying school tax and are forced to send their kids to a bad public school.

For me, prisons are in a gray area because they are an extension of the law enforcement process which I agree should be run by the government. At the same time, I wouldn't have a problem with the operation of a prison being contracted out, provided the appropriate safeguards and oversight were in place. The priority is to protect society and rehabilitate the convict. If the job is being done well and at reasonable cost, why does it matter who is paying the people doing the job?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

160 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders: �If I were to run for president, do you know how much money the Kochs would spend? [View all] kpete Oct 2014 OP

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #1

This has been a paid political announcement from louis-t Oct 2014 #3

they wouldn't spend a nickel hfojvt Oct 2014 #2

The MSM would not be the only ones, nor would Republicans. merrily Oct 2014 #32

Not much, by the standards of these things, I suspect. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #4

Good point. They wouldn't waste their money attacking him unless he looked like he might win (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #24

Yes they would. They KNOW someone like Bernie Sanders would have broad public sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #149

Yes, they would. His ideas are dangerous to them. They don't want anyone thinking them or merrily Oct 2014 #35

Watch this GE tv commercial with dirty fuzzy little Bad Idea characters Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #44

Don't need to. I read the New Testament. merrily Oct 2014 #49

The point is to sway immature thinkers into believing that ideas are bad things. That ideas should Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #52

Yes, I got it. merrily Oct 2014 #53

I hadn't seen that. F4lconF16 Oct 2014 #66

On the surface this commercial looks benign, but look deeper Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #75

I think your link might be broken. F4lconF16 Oct 2014 #76

Here's the link. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #92

They pour heavy money into elections they're already likely to win JonLP24 Oct 2014 #112

Go door-to-door. Talk about issues. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #141

We Need Millions More Like You, Who Have Ability to Persuade Total Strangers AndyTiedye Oct 2014 #152

You just smile and say you are a neighbor. I tell them where I live. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #153

Bwah ha ha ha ha! woo me with science Oct 2014 #121

He won't get that grassroots movement. badtoworse Oct 2014 #5

That's because most people are too stupid to know what it means. arcane1 Oct 2014 #15

Maybe, but there are many people who do know what means... badtoworse Oct 2014 #17

Yeah but they are hypocrites, at minimum. arcane1 Oct 2014 #19

Traffic lights. Medicare. Social Security. Food that is safe to eat. Etc. merrily Oct 2014 #36

The need for direct government ownership and oversight is greatly overestimated badtoworse Oct 2014 #63

I somewhat agreed until you got to schools.... blackspade Oct 2014 #86

Who said there had to be profit in the schools? badtoworse Oct 2014 #93

What really makes some inter-city schools crappy? olegramps Oct 2014 #97

There's a lot of truth in your post, but it doesn't change anything as far as schools go. badtoworse Oct 2014 #123

They represent a small percentage of the total school population. olegramps Oct 2014 #127

That way out of the dilemma needs to be expanded badtoworse Oct 2014 #128

How do you feel about a living wage as a minimum wage? dotymed Oct 2014 #126

The minimum wage should be raised. badtoworse Oct 2014 #129

Actuallly, there are reasons why government needs to do all those things, education, JDPriestly Oct 2014 #143

I'm in Italy right now and haven't been on the net for a week. badtoworse Oct 2014 #157

The problem with your view point is that jobs that provided for needed services rhett o rick Nov 2014 #158

Government contracts usually go out for bids badtoworse Nov 2014 #159

I don't have a problem with competition for non-essential services and products. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #160

badtoworse Diclotican Oct 2014 #27

Enjoying your socialist created internet? MontyPow Oct 2014 #29

Exactly! No one seems to get that. MoonchildCA Oct 2014 #33

I think the understanding of the commons has MontyPow Oct 2014 #47

He's an independent who was a Democratic Socialist, not a Socialist. merrily Oct 2014 #45

Yeah, and there are those that know what Communism and Capitalism Live and Learn Oct 2014 #82

Sanders isn't really a socialist in any pure sense. PatrickforO Oct 2014 #74

Sanders is more of a pragmatist than 90% of DU. joshcryer Oct 2014 #85

Bernie is very Pragmatic at times.. you can tell he actually thinks and looks at the whole picture. Cha Oct 2014 #144

He's a statesman. joshcryer Oct 2014 #145

I understand what Bernie's concerns are, even among those who supposedly support his ideas, Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #88

but populism sells everywhere frylock Oct 2014 #132

False. His political view is mainstream America. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #142

True, and bluestateguy Oct 2014 #154

That's why I get out there very publicly on Facebook, especially on insane threads that are seen Ed Suspicious Oct 2014 #156

Sounds like another good reason for him to run. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2014 #6

exactly! G_j Oct 2014 #25

Dude, if they spend that much for this, I would think that would be great. Xyzse Oct 2014 #7

They could drop ten billion and not even feel it. PeteSelman Oct 2014 #12

I do. Xyzse Oct 2014 #18

and if it worked? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #30

What do you mean? That Bernie run? Xyzse Oct 2014 #42

he doesn't even get a chance at the Primaries UNTIL he BECOMES a Democrat.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #62

If he can win the primaries F4lconF16 Oct 2014 #70

No he has not..... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #73

Proof he cannot win please. My crystal ball was repo-ed yesterday eom Tommymac Oct 2014 #89

first he is not a Democrat VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #90

I thought Hillary was a Repub. JEB Oct 2014 #114

welllll.....there you go "thinking again".... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #115

Hillary is a corporate candidate JEB Oct 2014 #117

no she isnt thats a lie... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #131

and this is Democratic Underground VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #116

Ah, so only Democrats can win the Presidency. Nice straw man. Tommymac Oct 2014 #133

and THIS is Democratic Underground..... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #135

Bernie Sanders is the Best 'Democrat' in Congress...even though he is not a member of the Party. Tommymac Oct 2014 #138

You asked if HE could get elected President... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #146

and its still Front-runner 64%.......Bernie...4%! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #147

That's very true. Xyzse Oct 2014 #96

oh yeah....3 weeks...what a window VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #100

I mean, 3 weeks before the election happens. Xyzse Oct 2014 #101

he can do whatever he wants.. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #105

I understand. Xyzse Oct 2014 #108

There it is folks. We are screwed. Sen Sanders is telling us the truth and most of us can't handle rhett o rick Oct 2014 #8

And sadly, not many people want to actively participate. Nevertheless, I won't give up! arcane1 Oct 2014 #16

The glaring truth is that Barack Obama could sacrifice everything and do very little to get LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #23

"You have to start local and build up" EXACTLY!! +100 arcane1 Oct 2014 #39

As if we haven't been trying on the local level? merrily Oct 2014 #43

Not to discourage local actions, but we've been doing that for decades and we only rhett o rick Oct 2014 #68

I didn't mean to sound like nothing is being done. The struggle is eternal. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #71

Grape or cherry? merrily Oct 2014 #37

Cherry rhett o rick Oct 2014 #65

FDR was only 63 when he died MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #61

Oh come on, do you really fold up so easily? ozone_man Oct 2014 #69

I am not sure you got my point which is that the American Oligarchs have so much power rhett o rick Oct 2014 #139

soooooo....I think YOU have been doing much VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #110

So to run for the 99% you basically need to have nothing to lose? Ampersand Unicode Oct 2014 #134

ONLY because YOU think YOU are the voice of the Democrats....YOU are NOT! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #136

Maybe what we should hope for is SheilaT Oct 2014 #9

Impossible. PeteSelman Oct 2014 #13

Just a little perspective on how much 80 billion dollars can generate in interest A HERETIC I AM Oct 2014 #26

Ahh, but wouldn't it be great if we SheilaT Oct 2014 #28

If Bernie wins, it will matter less how much money the Koch's have. merrily Oct 2014 #40

Wow! First 5 posts out of the gate are anti, almost as if they're already after him..... grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #10

Almost? merrily Oct 2014 #41

If they're not gettin paid, they're gettin played. nt adirondacker Oct 2014 #46

+1 adirondacker, I am so stealing that and you can't stop me. merrily Oct 2014 #54

! adirondacker Oct 2014 #109

Awww, thank you so much! Back at you. We all need a voice. merrily Oct 2014 #111

Bernie is not Hillary, so yeah, that will happen. djean111 Oct 2014 #104

Of course he is telling the truth, sadoldgirl Oct 2014 #11

It means he needs to hear from Americans who want him to run. merrily Oct 2014 #56

"unless there is the active involvement 365 days a year of the people" PREACH IT!!! arcane1 Oct 2014 #14

And the battle has been going on forever wilsonbooks Oct 2014 #22

Truths of this sort are jagged pills The Traveler Oct 2014 #20

He isn't expressing any reluctance to run. merrily Oct 2014 #51

Nothing, because he would lose in the primaries Renew Deal Oct 2014 #21

Disagree on both counts. They don't want him with a megaphone to spread his ideas. merrily Oct 2014 #50

Do you think Bernie will call for riots in the streets? jeepers Oct 2014 #59

Nice cut-and-paste from the 2008 Obama campaign BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #31

K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2014 #34

Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Oct 2014 #38

None. In fact I'm sure they hope he does run. Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #48

+1. Bernie's support, such as it is, comes from VT and forums like this. Like it or not, Tarheel_Dem Oct 2014 #57

You are mistaken about how much the Koch's would spend. merrily Oct 2014 #58

Do you think big business worried much about Dennis Kucinich? brooklynite Oct 2014 #98

Because Kuciinich and Sanders are the same? And the Koch brothers make up all of big business? merrily Oct 2014 #102

So if Sanders and the Koch brothers are all anamolous entities... brooklynite Oct 2014 #103

I did not say Sanders and Koch brothers are all anomolous entities. merrily Oct 2014 #107

I have no objection at all if Sanders gets in the Primary... brooklynite Oct 2014 #119

He might have a chance in the primary but for some strange reason scarystuffyo Oct 2014 #55

We are supposed to buy that she is a sure shot in the general--and no one merrily Oct 2014 #60

It all depends on the Ruling Oligarchs. I think they wanted Obama to win in 2008. rhett o rick Oct 2014 #67

Certainly, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy wanted Obama to be the nominee. merrily Oct 2014 #72

Yes but just how many Democrats that were still living in the 60's INdemo Oct 2014 #83

I may not be understanding. merrily Oct 2014 #84

No I meant how many Democrats just didn't vote because they refused to vote for INdemo Oct 2014 #95

Ah, thanks for the explanation. That clears up my question. merrily Oct 2014 #99

Senator Sanders spares us the BS. That's good. Babel_17 Oct 2014 #64

I'm ready. Le Taz Hot Oct 2014 #77

So, a Sanders candidacy would pour million$ into the economy? Beartracks Oct 2014 #78

+1 hedgehog Oct 2014 #106

unfortunately, i don't think so. our electorate is shallow and lazy. lack of name recognition alone dionysus Oct 2014 #79

Yes, it is critical to not diffuse the electorate and particularly your own support TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #80

I have never gotten out and worked for a campaign before. I would work for Bernie. liberal_at_heart Oct 2014 #81

As his fellow Vermonter I'd be 110% behind him. TRoN33 Oct 2014 #87

I'm in. marym625 Oct 2014 #91

Assuming he runs as a Democrat, they would spend it all on him, so he gets the Democratic nomination Reter Oct 2014 #94

The same amount they are going to spend anyway. n/t Orsino Oct 2014 #113

Bless him for speaking the truth. Is the country ready? imo no, the party... polichick Oct 2014 #118

I have began telling people who will listen dotymed Oct 2014 #120

How much did Hillary cost? JEB Oct 2014 #122

Kochs might spend to support Bernie's campaign JustABozoOnThisBus Oct 2014 #124

They sure paid Cuomo handsomely. nt adirondacker Oct 2014 #137

Kochs are going to spend that much on any Democrat running for President LynneSin Oct 2014 #125

TPTB will never allow anyone of Senator Sanders' philosophical bent to be nominated, much indepat Oct 2014 #130

Great excuse! brooklynite Oct 2014 #148

Go, Bernie. Run, Bernie. We will support you. I know how to register voters. I am JDPriestly Oct 2014 #140

I'll work for you bernie. redruddyred Oct 2014 #150

IF NOT NOW, WHEN? WE ARE IN THE LAST DAYS OF THE OLD SHIT, WE GOTTA drynberg Oct 2014 #151

kick woo me with science Oct 2014 #155