Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
43. I suppose that if you are losing your house or already lost it, voting is not a big priority.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:51 AM
Oct 2014

If you lost your job or are in the midst of a divorce that results from anger over money, you probably aren't really that interested in politics at all.

It's the task of Democratic politicians to take care of working people and to work harder to protect jobs and work in our country. Because Democrats generally are working people. When we get Democrats in Congress who agree to laws or programs that protect the rich, the bankers, those who outsource, HB-1 visas, trade agreements that make it easy to ship jobs overseas and sell cheap foreign-made products here, then it is unlikely that the Democrats, that is the working people of America, the middle and lower income people, will feel like voting.

So, the way the economic recession was handled by the Obama administration and other Democrats affects how well we will be doing this fall in the elections.

Everyone likes Obama. But people are likely to stay home when it comes to voting for Democrats in local elections. I do not expect to see a big turn-out in California, but I think Democrats will do better here than elsewhere.

Jerry Brown gets a lot of credit for that. He has not done everything right. Who can or does? But he rescued (with a lot of help from our California voters and especially our Democratic California legislature) the state from what the press claimed was near bankruptcy. That kind of good government makes Democrats strong and brings out Democratic voters. We need to see that at the federal level. Jerry Brown allowed voters to raise taxes on the more prosperous. That's important.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He really has been out of sync BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #1
One to read and bookmark flpoljunkie Oct 2014 #2
Indeed it is! YoungDemCA Oct 2014 #3
Also: Everyone do yourself a favor and don't read the comments section YoungDemCA Oct 2014 #4
Or, better yet, leave a comment. pamela Oct 2014 #6
THIS^^^^^^^^^^^ calimary Oct 2014 #7
Some are even paid to post to simulate popular support for the Right. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #10
you've got a good idea for a reply right in your post, too BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #23
Paul Krugman liberal from boston Oct 2014 #13
so maybe our drift at times.... ensemble Oct 2014 #32
Krugman criticized Obama from the left geek tragedy Oct 2014 #5
"it took him years to start dealing with that opposition realistically"... sendero Oct 2014 #8
+1 hifiguy Oct 2014 #18
While I disagree with the President on a few things, I've also been stunned by his low ratings. Vinca Oct 2014 #9
I think it's entirely media saturation...loud simple minded garbage, BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #24
It is not so surprising Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #33
Right after Obama scored a victory with a second term the media acted like he was a lame duck. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #11
Really poor defense from the left zipplewrath Oct 2014 #12
K&R. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #14
That is true... but Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #34
I suppose that if you are losing your house or already lost it, voting is not a big priority. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #43
I will acknowledge what Krugman says, but what he didn't say was Obama is owned by the Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #15
Please check yourself Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #35
I blame the President for what he did and dint do, and I am in a position to know what went down. Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #37
I am not putting you down Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #38
I am not attacking you either, however I disagree with you on two things. Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #39
Best step forward Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #40
Thanks. I believe both Elizabeth Warren and Bernie understand the reason for the attacks and don't Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #41
I hear you Lns.Lns Oct 2014 #42
Krugman nails it... again. nt stevenleser Oct 2014 #16
Kick. Withholding criticism til after the elections grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #17
I have alwasy respected Krugman's opinion. Thanks for posting this. Hekate Oct 2014 #19
Thanks! n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #20
K&R. Good article. DanTex Oct 2014 #21
I appreciate Krugman's defense of PBO navarth Oct 2014 #22
Krugman gets it... Spazito Oct 2014 #25
k&r Electric Monk Oct 2014 #26
Kick! thanks YDCA Cha Oct 2014 #27
This Seems About Right -- On Several Fronts DallasNE Oct 2014 #28
I think most of the article is well done dsc Oct 2014 #29
True, but the President's under the radar reforms include trucks, buses, and SUV's. sorechasm Oct 2014 #30
I am not saying Obama didn't do more than all the rest of them dsc Oct 2014 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Krugman: In Defense ...»Reply #43