Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
6. We've got a long ways to go...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 10:43 PM
Apr 2012

We'll find genes that affect bits of brain for a while, and generate all kinds of dumb theories about how everything is explained by these bits. And then we'll start noticing that multiple bits make up systems, and without the rest of a system a bit isn't as valuable, and there'll be a whole new level of complexity to the theories... and so on. Hopefully we won't do behaviorism again.

And then there's the question of whether any harmful effects are also associated with the gene. It would be a drag to exterminate some gene like this because it is also partially responsible for some genetic "disease".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tiny gene change affects ...»Reply #6