Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It wasn't until Pham was diagnosed with Ebola that health officials decided [View all]LisaL
(47,423 posts)40. Maybe they were too calm in Africa.
And it's spread.
Now people are dying there on the streets.
Ever thought about that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It wasn't until Pham was diagnosed with Ebola that health officials decided [View all]
boston bean
Oct 2014
OP
Wonder what the ratio of GOP federal managers is to Dem federal mangers? I bet.... nt
kelliekat44
Oct 2014
#10
I agree 00%. America needs a socialist government that would eliminate all the greed that currently
Louisiana1976
Oct 2014
#59
Except Iraq and Afghanistan. There the military geniuses get promoted upward until
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#29
The bottom line is paramount for a for-profit hospital like Texas Presbyterian.
SunSeeker
Oct 2014
#16
I think the real problem is fee for service, not whether it's a "non-profit."
SunSeeker
Oct 2014
#89
and now they are asked to sign an agreement to not go to any public place, but nobody mentions
magical thyme
Oct 2014
#7
I don't know if it is possible or not, but one thing that could be very helpful
boston bean
Oct 2014
#8
TV Stations in the DFW Metro have reported they the staff is still being paid. Texas businesses
DhhD
Oct 2014
#15
I have heard several times that everybody on staff who is now quarantined is still being paid.
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#27
I think that we need to be careful about who we think was supposed to make the rule and who was
jwirr
Oct 2014
#14
Republicans certainly want Government OUT, of the private for profit business of a hospital
DhhD
Oct 2014
#18
Yes, I know but the hospital did not train their staff with them so it was as good as having no
jwirr
Oct 2014
#30
if they did train their staff with them it's still as good as having no guidelines
TorchTheWitch
Oct 2014
#99
Ok but all the what ifs and OMG speculations are not necessary at this point
Heather MC
Oct 2014
#70
I feel like allowing the nurses to take care of other patients put them at risk
LeftInTX
Oct 2014
#51
With the exception of MSF, a lot of people- local officials to the WHO- were like "meh" for way too
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2014
#96
The bad news is that Duncan's illness has resulted in a HUGE number of people who have been exposed
Chemisse
Oct 2014
#36
I don't think it is so much luck, as the need to have high numbers of the virus
Chemisse
Oct 2014
#42
Yes, they did treat others on the same shift they were treating Mr. Duncan.
boston bean
Oct 2014
#47
So poorly run, and probably so thoroughly contaminated by now, I voted for
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#86
Would you want a nurse who had just worked on an Ebola patient to come treat you right after?
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#83
It doesn't take obvious bloody smears. All it takes is a single virus particle, which can survive
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#88
Epidemiology FAIL. Those nurses, with their poor PPE, were also caring for other patients
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#87