General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Pens Scathing Dissent On Texas Voter ID Law [View all]Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Cost does indeed enter into it. The conditions that are set by Texas are going to have an effect on turn out. If this wasn't, at least in part, a cynical maneuver to hurt turnout then much more would be in place to provide ID's to people.
For a few million dollars, mobile stations could be set up and we could make sure that we got everybody into one. If the State needs to see Birth Certificates then the State can arrange for that to happen - At no cost to the voter.
It seems that part of this is about sending the case back. It's beyond regrettable that voter turnout will be harmed in this year. Imo the standard for any confirmation of identity is that there should be no burden on the voter.
If the States want to go crazy confirming my DNA as being red, white, and blue, have at it. Just don't expect me to bleed out to provide it. And don't expect me to vote back in the officials who waste money.
Texas is not known for its lack of intelligent people. I'll concede that some form of voter ID is the will of the people. I won't concede that their current plan is even close to the best that they can do. Nothing short of the best that can be done is good enough when it comes to the people's right to cast their vote.