Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
8. I was trying to figure this out myself
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:54 AM
Oct 2014

And no apology necessary. I'm sure you've seen how obnoxious people can be on a perpetual basis here.

I don't think there is any way to know when or how either nurses became infected. So far, I haven't even seen any information on what days Vinson cared for Mr. Duncan. I tend to believe they were probably infected at a point in their care that had them showing symptoms within the 8-10 or thereabouts average period. Just because they got appropriate PPE after the first two or three days from the date of his admission doesn't mean that they were able to get out of it without infecting themselves, and there was still no disinfecting happening.

We're constantly told by everyone that has the experience and knowledge in this about the buddy system, supervision in PPE removal by a trained and experienced person and that disinfection before removal is KEY.

With all that went wrong, just like the CDC said, I don't think it can be known when or how either became infected. But since the average person starts to show symptoms somewhere between 8-10 days since infection, I can't help but believe that both of these nurses likely also fall into that spectrum. Just doesn't seem to be any way to know.

It also could be that the nurses were a hell of a lot more careful when they knew they weren't appropriately suited up but became too lax when they got the appropriate PPE without even realizing it. They had no previous experience or knowledge, were continually given changing protocols, weren't being appropriately supervised by anyone else that did and still with no disinfection process before removing the PPE. Infection could have happened at any time.

I had posted an article recently that discussed that 10% of caregivers in West Africa who become infected that are experienced and knowledgeable with the correct PPE and disinfection protocols become infected at the removal of PPE stage. I watched a video recently (can't recall now which one it was - I've watched so many) that the US missionary that became infected around the same time as Dr. Brantly didn't see patients and was only helping to suit up caregivers or other workers, spraying them down with disinfectant and supervising their removal of PPE. All I remember about the video as far as trying to identify it was that the whole thing was an interview with her and her husband after she recovered.

Be as tinfoil hat as you want to be. You should see some of the tinfoily things that get posted here pretty regularly. It was a good post. I bookmarked it soon after you posted it since I didn't have time to reply at the time, and I rarely bookmark any posts here to return to.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She was not vomiting, producing diarrhea stools, or bleeding anywhere Warpy Oct 2014 #1
Any nurse taking care of Mr. Duncan with the piss poor support they were getting from hospital KMOD Oct 2014 #2
She was LOW RISK for contagion KMOD Oct 2014 #3
Incubation period is anywhere from 2 to 21 days. And maybe even longer than 21 days. LisaL Oct 2014 #4
I'm not sure it's obvious as you say KMOD Oct 2014 #5
Some patients never run the high fever. Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #14
13% never run any fever at all. n/t Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #21
Well, that's one study! Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #23
the reason for the discrepancy is ecstatic Oct 2014 #6
They think the virus is airborne? Delphinus Oct 2014 #9
There are infectious disease professionals that are worried about aerosolization, mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #11
I had read the transcipt of the Dr.'s interview KMOD Oct 2014 #17
All of those questions have answers. morningfog Oct 2014 #10
They don't believe it is airborne in a normal situation Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #13
They do not think it is airborne. It is NOT airborne. Marrah_G Oct 2014 #26
Please provide a link stating that Ebola is now airborne. I bet you don't find one. Avalux Oct 2014 #31
Putting in a dialysis cath and intubation is riskier than average pugetres Oct 2014 #7
I was trying to figure this out myself TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #8
WHO recently recalculated mean incubation at 11.4 days Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #15
surface areas likely weren't constantly cleaned TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #16
Thank you Torch, KMOD Oct 2014 #18
This information was released. LisaL Oct 2014 #20
the "full protective gear" left their necks totally exposed. magical thyme Oct 2014 #12
So consider those Dallas nurses as never adequately protected KMOD Oct 2014 #19
I hadn't heard before that the CDC directly interacted with the nurses Fumesucker Oct 2014 #22
she said when she asked the CDC why their necks were exposed with magical thyme Oct 2014 #25
If you have medical training, Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #24
You know what, Ms. Toad? KMOD Oct 2014 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #27
Hello, ann KMOD Oct 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #32
At this point all I will say etherealtruth Oct 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #8