I would like to thank the alerter for calling my attention to this. Still laughing. 
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Personal attack.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:29 AM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It was funny.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: NYC_SKP says, FFS, this is not a violation. Taterguy is talking about the cannibals, not the poster or anyone who is protected. No violation, Leave It Alone. Hi DU, how ya doin? Hi other Jurors!!! Wasn't that fun????
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I will refer the good alerter back to DU Rule #347, Page 72, Section 87C, Sub-Section 'H', Paragraph Number 67, Line 10, To Wit: Taterguy is a dumbass.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Personal attack? By answering OP's question "how many was that?" after both the thread title and article said 3 were arrested - with the answer 3? Get a grip. I am nominating this for a DUzy.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read