General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCED US TO GAY MARRIAGE [View all]LostInAnomie
(14,428 posts)1. "TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCED US TO GAY MARRIAGE"
Words tend to mean something. The word "introduced" means: to present (a person, product, etc.) to a particular group of individuals or to the general public for or as if for the first time by a formal act, announcement, series of recommendations or events, etc. Since as you stated down thread the first gay marriage was performed in 1975, it would be impossible to be "introduced" in May, 2004. This is especially true since they were also performed in SF and New Paltz in Feb., 2004.
2. Since gay marriage bans are unconstitutional, the marriages in 1975 and Feb. 2004 were legal.
Even you yourself said down thread "It was legal in Boulder too when it was issued." when you were fighting with LA over if Boulder of SF did it first. You can't have it both ways. They were either legal and your article is wrong, or it wasn't legal when Boulder issued the the marriage certificate and you are just engaging in sophistry to win an argument.