Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I do not believe this statement to be true. Jenoch Oct 2014 #1
So, one has to show their. Federal permit before purchasing an automatic weapon at a gun show? world wide wally Oct 2014 #12
Try going to a gun show and buying an automatic weapon. GGJohn Oct 2014 #13
Then stand corrected. I should have said SEMI AUTOMATIC weapon world wide wally Oct 2014 #15
No problem, and you're right, GGJohn Oct 2014 #18
That's not how it works. Jenoch Oct 2014 #19
Absolutely false. former9thward Oct 2014 #2
Here comes the nit-picking over calling a semi-auto weapon automatic or an assault rifle.. n/t brewens Oct 2014 #3
Not nit picking. GGJohn Oct 2014 #5
When you refer to a pistol as a revolver or an automatic Bandit Oct 2014 #25
What kind of pistol are you Jenoch Oct 2014 #26
You mean this is fake? sarisataka Oct 2014 #33
In Texas Jenoch Oct 2014 #36
When someone says automatic weapon, GGJohn Oct 2014 #30
I thought he intended to mean semi-automatic, a common mistake. To me I think a semi-auto weapon in brewens Oct 2014 #104
There are very different procedures/requirements on buying a tammywammy Oct 2014 #7
Mixing the two up is like calling an 18 wheeler a sedan. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #27
Absolutely false. GGJohn Oct 2014 #4
Only those who are afraid of the ballot box, try to keep voters from filling it. liberal N proud Oct 2014 #6
False Matrosov Oct 2014 #8
It's extremely hard and very expensive to legally buy an automatic weapon. DesMoinesDem Oct 2014 #9
...and at noon the sun blinks: "Eat at Joe's" Eleanors38 Oct 2014 #10
Will we be chastised if we criticize Texas for their "visionary" policies? world wide wally Oct 2014 #11
Just, factually no Recursion Oct 2014 #14
Its satire -- but anti-gunnsters think its true. ​ aikoaiko Oct 2014 #16
Will Durst once made a guy lose $468,000. Jenoch Oct 2014 #21
Player: You sure? Durst: Yeah. Player: You know for a fact? Durst: yeah aikoaiko Oct 2014 #22
Are you calling Jenoch Oct 2014 #23
Durst. I was quoting the video where he gave bad advise. I'll fix the post to be more clear. aikoaiko Oct 2014 #24
Seriously? sarisataka Oct 2014 #17
Actually, that's not true at all. MineralMan Oct 2014 #20
A gun permit requires a criminal background check and finger prints hack89 Oct 2014 #28
The real reason a gun permit is an acceptable ID... NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #29
In Texas a license/permit is not needed to purchase or own a firearm. oneshooter Oct 2014 #34
The concealed carry permit was what I was referring to. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #68
Not a bit of truth to that, whatsoever. linuxman Oct 2014 #31
200 bucks and a 8 month wait....I doubt registering is that much or long. ileus Oct 2014 #32
Obviously, OP meant "semi-auto." While the gun nomenclature purists Hoyt Oct 2014 #35
If OP meant semi auto, then why hasn't the OP edited it to say that? GGJohn Oct 2014 #37
Like I said, gunners will whine and complain. Hoyt Oct 2014 #40
Don't want to answer the question? GGJohn Oct 2014 #43
Simple question that you can't answer, so you resort to attacking the poster joeglow3 Oct 2014 #69
Yes it does Duckhunter935 Oct 2014 #99
Since the OP sarisataka Oct 2014 #38
It's easier to buy several AR15s and thousands of rounds of ammo than get registered to vote. Hoyt Oct 2014 #41
Actually, that's not true at all. GGJohn Oct 2014 #46
Actually it is. You can buy them legally in a private sale with nothing but a fistful of cash. Hoyt Oct 2014 #50
And registering to vote only requires filling out a card, mailing it in, GGJohn Oct 2014 #52
Standing in line while registering, getting a photo ID if you don't have one, standing in line again Hoyt Oct 2014 #56
You can sling all the hyperbole you want, GGJohn Oct 2014 #58
Nope it is true, it's easier to buy an "assault/tactical" weapon and ammo in Texas than to vote. Hoyt Oct 2014 #60
Maybe you should read the article. GGJohn Oct 2014 #62
Look, even Manufacturer Colt calls their 1911 an "AUTOMATIC Pistol." Wise up. Hoyt Oct 2014 #67
Sigh. GGJohn Oct 2014 #72
This ain't one. Automatic is apt description and all you care about is criticizing OP's point about Hoyt Oct 2014 #73
No, automatic is not an apt description, and all I care about is fact, GGJohn Oct 2014 #79
40% of gunz are sold legally by handing cash to a gun owner. No ID required. Hoyt Oct 2014 #80
This isn't about that, is it. GGJohn Oct 2014 #84
Do you have a recent link to back up that 40% number. Jenoch Oct 2014 #87
I gave one previously, you need to learn how to search/research things. Hoyt Oct 2014 #89
I already found it. See my response to your other post containing that link. Jenoch Oct 2014 #90
That link you provided? Did you even read it? GGJohn Oct 2014 #91
Obviously, you are not familiar with statistics either. Hoyt Oct 2014 #93
Obviously, you are not familiar with more recent stats either. GGJohn Oct 2014 #94
your link does not even think it is accurate Duckhunter935 Oct 2014 #100
And it's still much more easier to vote than it is to buy an automatic weapon. GGJohn Oct 2014 #64
Where I live Jenoch Oct 2014 #86
That's they way it should be. But, you don't even need that for private transfer. Hoyt Oct 2014 #92
You do like to fudge the truth don't you. GGJohn Oct 2014 #95
Not Texas, or most others. Hoyt Oct 2014 #97
17 states + DC require background checks for all transfers. GGJohn Oct 2014 #98
Huh? Jenoch Oct 2014 #96
Registering to vote required filling out a card and mailing it in. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #48
You forget standing in line, getting photo ID, standing in line to vote, etc. Hoyt Oct 2014 #57
Facts are more important to me Hoyt. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #61
The OP's point is accurate, it is too difficult for some to vote. Hoyt Oct 2014 #74
But NOT more difficult. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #77
OK, at least you are now acknowledging the issue. Cracks me up when the liquor store clerk asks for Hoyt Oct 2014 #81
I've always acknowledged the issue. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #85
Does it make me happy? sarisataka Oct 2014 #101
Then why didn't he say "revolver"? Straw Man Oct 2014 #42
Your love of gunz is obscuring the point we should be focusing on. Hoyt Oct 2014 #44
Actually, you're wrong again. GGJohn Oct 2014 #47
Ever heard of, or participated in, a private purchase? Here's my money, give me that baby before Hoyt Oct 2014 #51
The only defending going on here is you defending the OP's false GGJohn Oct 2014 #53
And, BTW, it's 30 fold harder to buy an automatic weapon than it is to register to vote. GGJohn Oct 2014 #55
Once again, there is a relatively small contingent who knows or cares about the difference between Hoyt Oct 2014 #59
The legal and financial difference is huge. Straw Man Oct 2014 #66
So why do manufacturers like Colt refer to pistols like the 1911 as an AUTOMATIC? Hoyt Oct 2014 #70
When the 1911 was first introduced, it got the name "automatic" because it automatically reloaded GGJohn Oct 2014 #76
Because at the time (1911) that was how it was differentiated from a revolver. Straw Man Oct 2014 #83
I'm kind of guessing "private elections" don't require picture I.D. beevul Oct 2014 #105
More babble. Straw Man Oct 2014 #65
Remarkable. The author of the article uses one paragraph of hyperbole out of ten to make a point... bluesbassman Oct 2014 #39
F$@kin A. Hoyt Oct 2014 #45
Most people focus on a thread title and content. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #49
Unfortunately the US electorate ends up with many under informed voters... bluesbassman Oct 2014 #54
In this case, the title was meant to draw attention, and it has. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #75
6.6 million guns are sold each year WITHOUT a background check or photo-ID, just cash. Hoyt Oct 2014 #78
They are also not government transactions, and not comparable. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #82
The link you posted says the 40% figure is B.S. Jenoch Oct 2014 #88
The question is why couldn't the 9 legitimate paragraphs stand without one paragraph of bullshit? joeglow3 Oct 2014 #71
Stand your ground against Ebola! JoePhilly Oct 2014 #63
The OP is standing their ground against fact checking. Travis_0004 Oct 2014 #102
Perhaps they are factose intolerant. oneshooter Oct 2014 #103
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»....in the great state of...»Reply #9