Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drm604

(16,230 posts)
11. What does "ownership model" mean in this context?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:22 PM
Oct 2014

Is it similar to "neighborhood watch" or is it something different?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Practiced by authoritarians everywhere since J Edgar Hoover. Octafish Oct 2014 #1
any chance she can sue him in civil court? belzabubba333 Oct 2014 #2
yes, she can sue azureblue Oct 2014 #10
One would have to show real damages, and here the boss gave her the phone number. jtuck004 Oct 2014 #37
Wrong answer tabasco Oct 2014 #41
Well, there is that <G>. jtuck004 Oct 2014 #42
Kick. riqster Oct 2014 #3
Cut the police budget at least in half. JEB Oct 2014 #4
Actually I would recommend doubling it. cstanleytech Oct 2014 #17
Yes. Clean house of the scum and reward ($$) the real police. SomeGuyInEagan Oct 2014 #20
No. R.Quinn Oct 2014 #23
Quinn its not just wages they clearly need better training and training costs money. cstanleytech Oct 2014 #27
We will have to agree to disagree. R.Quinn Oct 2014 #29
Ya but that issue you raised of their attitude is part of what better training would cstanleytech Oct 2014 #30
Funny how Democrats turn into tea partiers when it comes to one group of state or city employees. delta17 Oct 2014 #46
Actually Democrats do not turn into tea partiers when it comes to state or city employees. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #62
Oh please. R.Quinn Oct 2014 #66
However lack of money attracts bribes in droves. Pay your civil servants a living wage. Hekate Oct 2014 #35
Don't they make more than teachers already? And with less schooling. FTP panader0 Oct 2014 #40
That ^^^ onecaliberal Oct 2014 #45
You make a persuasive argument quakerboy Oct 2014 #55
The cops are getting plenty of money. JEB Oct 2014 #25
I will agree cstanleytech Oct 2014 #26
The only correct answer, so, of course, it'll never be employed. nt valerief Oct 2014 #44
Unfortunately, training doesn't cure racism. lob1 Oct 2014 #33
Nope but make the course and or school long enough cstanleytech Oct 2014 #34
You are correct. Stop funding the insanity. +1 whereisjustice Oct 2014 #52
Some right wing moron called one of my clients once MineralMan Oct 2014 #5
good for her heaven05 Oct 2014 #6
k&r valerief Oct 2014 #7
"Ownership Model" PeoViejo Oct 2014 #8
Good for her! Exposure of intimidation is critical. nt mountain grammy Oct 2014 #9
What does "ownership model" mean in this context? drm604 Oct 2014 #11
It's seems to be sort of a neighborhood watch with less "watch" csziggy Oct 2014 #53
Does the police department not have any policies against intimidation? etherealtruth Oct 2014 #12
You would think so! Everyone except the St Louis PD that is. Cha Oct 2014 #71
The constabulary forces in this country have declared war upon the citizenry (or at KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #13
Yes they have. WHEN CRABS ROAR Oct 2014 #22
Wow, great post! greatlaurel Oct 2014 #14
St. Louis reputation goes deeper in the mud of outrageous Police behavior! gordianot Oct 2014 #15
They're scared alfredo Oct 2014 #16
Wow. Beyond scary. I hope she is lawyered up. McCamy Taylor Oct 2014 #18
Update posted on youtube: avebury Oct 2014 #19
Where does the link go? nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #39
real good question druidity33 Oct 2014 #48
Here is a story on the officer now being investigated: Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #51
The first amendment won't protect his job Major Nikon Oct 2014 #57
It does get a little tricky-er when the employer is also the government. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #58
There may be a constitutional right to talk politics,... Major Nikon Oct 2014 #59
That opinion is woefully outdated: Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #60
Not so much in this case Major Nikon Oct 2014 #61
How so? tooeyeten Oct 2014 #64
Go back and read this entire sub-thread. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2014 #67
Ok tooeyeten Oct 2014 #73
You're right tooeyeten Oct 2014 #65
Is it fascism yet? malaise Oct 2014 #21
This is clearcut violation of First Amendment rights by a government figure. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #24
Keith desperately needs to be a bagboy at the Piggly Wiggly. byronius Oct 2014 #28
except, I would not want him near my groceries--not sure I could wash off the contamination. niyad Oct 2014 #49
Gotta hear this...can't now nt duhneece Oct 2014 #31
"So.... were you doing it for my benefit?" LMAO n/t secondwind Oct 2014 #32
Seems to me.. Keith chose the wrong citizen to intimidate with his bully tactics and is only Cha Oct 2014 #72
Unbelievable! Enthusiast Oct 2014 #36
I have had this happen to me.... by an infamous FB bully named Brian Kolfage Jr. millijac Oct 2014 #38
WTF! nt City Lights Oct 2014 #43
Kpete, you should be *ashamed* of yourself MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #47
Thankyou MannyGoldstein kpete Oct 2014 #68
k and r for continued visibility. these roaches need sunlight!! niyad Oct 2014 #50
, blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #54
WOW! She is Amazing! Good on her! At first I thought they were saying she was "insightful".. Cha Oct 2014 #56
mahalo kpete Oct 2014 #70
This is a job for the ACLU. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #63
So what is up with the PDs in that area? Are they all commited to being jackbooted thugs? Rex Oct 2014 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»St. Louis Police Officer ...»Reply #11