Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Monica Lewinsky [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)42. I have great empathy for you. You were the victim in that scenario.
Another spouse, as you might remember from the media coverage, got that "harridan" treatment as well and was portrayed as a lamp throwing, piano-legged, haggard old bee word. They're still trying to denigrate her and characterize her anger and upset over what was a blatant betrayal, after all these years.
I wonder if there's any Koch money up in this latest appearance?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
22 years old are old enough to sign contracts, buy a bottle of booze, and fight and die for their
MADem
Oct 2014
#39
I agree. Talk about a double standard. If a male intern would 've gotten busy with a female Prez...
zonkers
Oct 2014
#2
Speaking of double standard, when a boss has a relationship with a subordinate, it's not NORMALLY
hughee99
Oct 2014
#87
As I said, those are the words Monica herself used. HER comment, out of her mouth.
Autumn
Oct 2014
#96
Actually those were words she reportedly said according to someone who knew her,
hughee99
Oct 2014
#100
It was sex between two consenting adults, whether or not they were married or not?
Neoma
Oct 2014
#91
Yes and Hillary's enabling her husband's lewd workplace behavior was a disgrace too.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Oct 2014
#110
"Clinton is as much to blame" ... he's MORE to blame! Clinton was more than twice her age, holding
Raine
Oct 2014
#19
absolutely right. He's far, far more to blame. and the apologists make me want to vomit.
cali
Oct 2014
#31
Of course he was more to blame--he was the "senior" in that equation. There was a power imbalance.
MADem
Oct 2014
#41
I think he pretty much came under a quite of bit of scorn. Which he deserved.
dballance
Oct 2014
#44
We certainly do our prudish best to apply scorn and embarrassment to simple sex.
LanternWaste
Oct 2014
#98
Maybe if those fifty FBI agents, hadn't been tied up "investigating the Clintons,"...
3catwoman3
Oct 2014
#80
In her first major public appearance, she is speaking out against Cyber Bullying.
LanternWaste
Oct 2014
#99
I don't wish her ill, but don't understand why she needs to make her life about that affair
Justice
Oct 2014
#47
Not sure what this is about or what dealings she currently has with the press.
NCTraveler
Oct 2014
#53
Has everyone here forgotten that the IMPEACHMENT of the President was a result of this
CTyankee
Oct 2014
#76