Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
22. It is what I said. In most infections is it 7-10 days. I go on to discuss the 21 day window.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 04:31 PM
Oct 2014

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting. Did you do all that research yourself? ffr Oct 2014 #1
Yes. I've been following it and posting these timelines every couple days. morningfog Oct 2014 #2
we don't know when any of the hospital workers could have gotten infected TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #3
For the workers, the timeline uses the last morningfog Oct 2014 #7
We do know the last possible exposure date to MrDuncan. uppityperson Oct 2014 #19
Pham and Vinson both became sick after the 7-10 day period. pnwmom Oct 2014 #4
First of all, we don't know when they were infected. morningfog Oct 2014 #6
The CDC, if you believe them, thinks the infections occurred between Sept. 28 and 30. pnwmom Oct 2014 #8
They still had skin showing during DUncan's last days. morningfog Oct 2014 #10
So in this case you've decided not to believe the CDC. pnwmom Oct 2014 #16
Why does logic and facts seem to bother you? nt Logical Oct 2014 #21
I like logic and facts. I just haven't seen any in this thread from you. pnwmom Oct 2014 #25
Which post did I say something you disagree with? Link please. nt Logical Oct 2014 #26
Post 26. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #28
I get it, nothing I said was wrong. You just like to whine. nt Logical Oct 2014 #30
What the hell are you talking about? morningfog Oct 2014 #23
No,they believe the nurses got exposed in the EARLIEST days of hospitalization, not the last. pnwmom Oct 2014 #24
LOL, "It is still unclear how, exactly, Pham and Vinson were infected with Ebola" means..... Logical Oct 2014 #29
And yet the head of the CDC thinks it happened then -- and it makes the most sense pnwmom Oct 2014 #32
FWIW, The nurses never wore full protective gear. uppityperson Oct 2014 #35
The CDC also says the mean time is 9-11 days but you don't believe that either apparently. nt Logical Oct 2014 #36
And Pham and Vinson also had contact in the last morningfog Oct 2014 #34
self-delete (dupe) pnwmom Oct 2014 #8
LOL, the word "MOST" must be confusing you. nt Logical Oct 2014 #33
Thank you for the thread. The people who thrive on fear will find reasons to panic anyhow. LeftyMom Oct 2014 #5
"The incubation period of this strain is 7-10 days in most people who become infected." Avalux Oct 2014 #11
There are more source, but I found these quickly: morningfog Oct 2014 #12
And here: morningfog Oct 2014 #13
Thank you. I would like you to revise your statement for accuracy. Avalux Oct 2014 #14
It is specific for this strain as well. morningfog Oct 2014 #15
Ok, but that's now what you said. Read your statement, it doesn't match. Avalux Oct 2014 #17
It is what I said. In most infections is it 7-10 days. I go on to discuss the 21 day window. morningfog Oct 2014 #22
Thanks again morningfog uppityperson Oct 2014 #18
Love these posts. Logic!! nt Logical Oct 2014 #20
Not particularly relevant. The ONLY number you can take to the bank is 21 days. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #27
No celebration here. Acknowledging the worst morningfog Oct 2014 #31
No more new cases is a BIG DEAL! How can you not understand that? nt Logical Oct 2014 #37
I totally understand that and am greatly relieved. That said, NO WAY kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #38
LOL, the virus does not know we are "crowing". And only TWO people have had it so far. And it is.... Logical Oct 2014 #39
This was great news. =) AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dallas Ebola infection/in...»Reply #22