Elizabeth Warren is angry, and if she isn't running, a whole lot of trees have died in vain

[cascadiance]

36. You're ignoring the FACT that corporate interests and their beholden like you would jump on her...

... and try to use the corporate media to push her down before she got started if she were to announce now. It is WAY TOO EARLY to make any kind of conclusion that she is running or not. She moreso than Clinton has far more of a disincentive to announce she's running now, as the corporate world WANTS someone like Clinton running and not Warren. You and others here (one of perhaps I can't read their posts here since I have that person on ignore now), keep trying to make it appear to be FACT that she is not running when you are NOT GOD and don't know that. Many of us who WANT her to run and aren' PREDICTING she will run like you are PREDICTING she won't, are just doing our jobs as citizens of a democratic republic to voice our OPINIONS that we WANT her to run and represent us when so many CORPORATE Democrats don't today, that some here want to still seem to prop up in power.

Now, if you don't care for her as much and DON'T WANT her to run, and feel you have good reasons to share on why she shouldn't, that would be worthwhile to discuss, though perhaps most here would disagree with you in hopefully a healthy discussion, but to continue just hammer at people voicing their opinions that we shouldn't express our opinions because you KNOW the future that she WON'T run, is not what facilitates democracy and the spirit of what this web site should be all about!

Many of us are quite tired of people continuing to just say they continue to know reality to deny a future that in our minds is possible and desirable, instead of having fruitful discussions. We've heard it far too many times, and it isn't new information.