General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren is angry, and if she isn't running, a whole lot of trees have died in vain [View all]billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Its just name recognition this early and meaningless as history has proven over and over again. I wish I trusted her because I agree that without her character flaws, allegiance to wars and mass incarceration, and servitude to Big Banks and Republican Icons I actually do think she would be the best candidate to win. I like Warren for her policies and not just for her gender but honestly I would love to see a woman as President. Im not stupid though...Condeleeza Rice is Black and female but her policies are too evil for my tastes regardless of how much she likes college football. And, sadly, I see Clinton as further continuing Bush foreign policy and was representing the contingent that bullied Obama into doing the same. Im sorry but I believe a Progressive can win because people are sick of this crap. I know the game is rigged but Im not caving. And you will watch that 64% nosedive quickly if a good candidate appears. The Democratic Party has shot itself in the foot by focusing so much on one candidate this early. Not smart politics.