Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Ferguson, the Grand Jury Is Out and the Fix Is in [View all]KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)17. "Verdict"? You mean Grand Jury decision about whether to indict? Has Governor Nixon been
informed of the GJ's decision already? If so, can you please provide a link to that information?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It does seem the grand jury is holding off on the decision until winter sets in. ...
spin
Oct 2014
#1
You can't tell me they haven't come to a decision , they know by now what that decision is
scarystuffyo
Oct 2014
#2
"Verdict"? You mean Grand Jury decision about whether to indict? Has Governor Nixon been
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#17
I am sure the prosecutor is drawing this out as long as possible hoping things will be
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#3
I share your absolute mistrust of the legitimacy of St. Louis County law enforcement and
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#18
I would go so far as to say that, were Governor Nixon to appoint a Special Prosecutor with zero
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#42
They didn't even fill out a report until the FBI asked where it was....
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2014
#22
Is this just a feeling you have? Or have you read that the decision is forthcoming
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#19
Jesus, that would take some chutzpah to release the decision (assuming a no bill) tomorrow, when
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#23
But of course....... "eyewitness testimony is inherently unreliable"...........
raven mad
Oct 2014
#12
I've said it may soon be 'gut check' time for everyone on DU and, by extension,
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#20
No non-Wilson witness, AFAIK, has maintained the ridiculous assertiont that
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#41
So, you think a guy just walking down the street decided to jump into a cop car and attack him?
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2014
#52
Anything is "possible" probable!? HELL NO!!! Especially seeing the guy SUPPOSEDLY (no not really)
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#60
Yeap, a stupid LEO would, I'm 6'5" and would get beat on wiff by the thug LEOs like the KKK backed
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#66
Wilson could have been trying to detain Brown. That's what some witnesses said.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2014
#48
Yeap, all the black folk are lying ... Wilson has no statements officilly written but all the "other
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#69
"was such a significant threat that Wilson was compelled to shoot" HOW!!!!!!
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#33
7 or 8 African American eyewitnesses have provided testimony consistent with Wilson’s account
maced666
Oct 2014
#56
If those African-American witnesses exist, we will learn their identities soon enough
branford
Oct 2014
#64
Yes, because it's not answering the crime Wilson did .. Hint: the people who back Wilson have
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#68
For the life of me, I can't figure out how Brown's blood on the gun=Brown assaulting Wilson
me b zola
Oct 2014
#65
Brown is black, if the sky was grey that day to some people... Brown made it that way... Also...
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#67