Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Homeland Security raids lingerie shop for panties that violate MLB copyright [View all]frazzled
(18,402 posts)37. I doubt the panty lady quoted knew what she was talking about
Or that the Washington Times bothered to fact check this at all. It was trademark infringement. The problem was with a panty lady's account to a know-nothing reporter, not the actual facts of the case.
Blame it on cheap journalism. Or blame it on the Bossa Nova. But if this indeed happened, I wouldn't particularly blame the "copyright" misnomer on the poor Homeland Security guys sent to pick up the panties.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Homeland Security raids lingerie shop for panties that violate MLB copyright [View all]
davidn3600
Oct 2014
OP
If some supporters are so quick to throw you underall the bus, you should give them...
pinboy3niner
Oct 2014
#129
Much of the work of many agencies consolidated under DHS is not related to national security
pinboy3niner
Oct 2014
#54
Accepting your statement without dispute, it still doesn't lessen the stupidity of what we're seeing
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#60
They weren't "raiding". They didn't have guns. They were enforcing a civil injunction (nt)
Recursion
Oct 2014
#62
Accepted without argument. However having DHS enforce copyright infringements, no matter how
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#76
If your argument is that Commerce's enforcement unit should not be in DHS, I've been there for
Recursion
Oct 2014
#77
well, this report is from the washington times. . . if those cretins really were from homeland
niyad
Oct 2014
#12
No, DHS just got all the "miscellaneous" enforcement units from other departments
Recursion
Oct 2014
#33
Or how about they pick their battles and let people print their own shit
Ampersand Unicode
Oct 2014
#139
Enforcement of trademark and copyright laws with guns and Homeland Security makes it a police state.
Initech
Oct 2014
#42
Perhaps if she said to them as they left, "I hope you enjoy them" that might explain something.
Maraya1969
Oct 2014
#19
I wonder how many tax dollars it cost the residents of KC to build their damn stadium.
B Calm
Oct 2014
#57
Because something like 9/10ths of Federal Law Enforcement got shuffled into Homeland Security
Recursion
Oct 2014
#30
More proof that all these multi billion dollar 'govt' agencies, the NSA, Homeland Security
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#36
Did they fly HomSec Team Crotchrot from Andrews aboard C-130's & airdrop 'em behind enemy lines?
NBachers
Oct 2014
#39
Incorrect - 18 U.S. Code § 2320 - Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services
jberryhill
Oct 2014
#104
My initial thoughts: They couldn't possibly be agents from Homeland Security (!!!!)
2banon
Oct 2014
#73
It is a non-story. If terrorists had blown up a school while these folks were saving us from deadly
jtuck004
Oct 2014
#132
Next, DHS will arrest you for still wearing your 'Tuesday' panties on Thursday
pinboy3niner
Oct 2014
#99
Because if we don't fight copyright infringement over here, we'll have to fight it over there.
Wella
Oct 2014
#122
ISIS funded with counterfeit panties, HS shields us from danger? No leaks? n/t
jtuck004
Oct 2014
#125