Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

no madokie Oct 2014 #1
No (nt) bigwillq Oct 2014 #2
No n/t PeoViejo Oct 2014 #3
Not far enough nt COLGATE4 Oct 2014 #4
I agree ablamj Oct 2014 #128
^^THIS^^ n/t 2naSalit Oct 2014 #131
Truth hurts. Lochloosa Oct 2014 #5
Nope. Scuba Oct 2014 #6
Well, he WAS a little too nice to ... 99Forever Oct 2014 #7
If only homegirl Oct 2014 #83
Welcome to DU, homegirl! calimary Oct 2014 #92
I like the way you think. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #96
Wouldn't that just beat all? calimary Oct 2014 #104
^^^^+1000 nt hopemountain Oct 2014 #130
++++ gringo43 Oct 2014 #142
Hell NO!! nt kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #8
No.....this is why elections matter...SCOTUS. nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #9
Yeah, the big fascist fuckers at the top. Cha Oct 2014 #22
Justice Alletto hair appears thicker. Half-Century Man Oct 2014 #10
There was no mention of Justice Alito in the cartoon, was there? Cal33 Oct 2014 #43
Ah, my bad. Half-Century Man Oct 2014 #46
I, too, got his name wrong the first time. Had to edit it. :) Cal33 Oct 2014 #50
No. nt TBF Oct 2014 #11
No. Has there been some controversy or do you think so? Is it the Ginsberg ref that gets it in trouble? lunasun Oct 2014 #12
The latter n/t n2doc Oct 2014 #13
He nails it malaise Oct 2014 #14
Great cartoon Gothmog Oct 2014 #15
Pushing it BuelahWitch Oct 2014 #16
There is an ick factor libodem Oct 2014 #23
Or could it be a case of "The Stockholm Syndrome?" Cal33 Oct 2014 #44
He's captured by something libodem Oct 2014 #49
Doubtful. hifiguy Oct 2014 #74
+1 bravenak Oct 2014 #103
I hate the term "self-loathing" Scootaloo Oct 2014 #133
Hell to the, No! libodem Oct 2014 #17
Absolutely Not n/t albino65 Oct 2014 #18
Sadly, no. Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #19
Clarence Thomas Pushes Past Ruth Bader Ginsberg In A Display Of Utter Disrespect jtuck004 Oct 2014 #20
Got to disagree about one thing... RoBear Oct 2014 #34
I think he would push her down a marble staircase if the opportunity presented itself to jtuck004 Oct 2014 #38
true. RoBear Oct 2014 #53
“Do what you feel in your heart to be right – for you’ll be criticized anyway. jtuck004 Oct 2014 #63
Nope n/t zeemike Oct 2014 #21
no...it is spot on noiretextatique Oct 2014 #24
mmmmmmmmmmmaaaayyyybe paulkienitz Oct 2014 #25
NO Plucketeer Oct 2014 #26
Not far enough. GoCubsGo Oct 2014 #27
Alito is in a corner moving his lips, hard to show in a cartoon. gordianot Oct 2014 #30
Where's Alito? world wide wally Oct 2014 #28
No. Danziger has balls! asjr Oct 2014 #29
No. The targets are completely deserving of such a depiction. Paladin Oct 2014 #31
No. Not at all Takket Oct 2014 #32
I can see where a couple of the pscot Oct 2014 #33
Yes Dirty Socialist Oct 2014 #35
ted cruz is a supreme? he has not gone too far, if it's true, and it is. eom ellenfl Oct 2014 #36
no spike91nz Oct 2014 #37
. libodem Oct 2014 #52
Danziger always nails it. sarge43 Oct 2014 #39
He's right on. proReality Oct 2014 #40
No. jwirr Oct 2014 #41
Yes. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #42
One interesting point is, Can any Republican get into any high position today without being a Cal33 Oct 2014 #54
Yes. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #55
These days? No. hifiguy Oct 2014 #76
You're correct. The Neo-Cons joined the Republican Party some 40+ years ago, worked Cal33 Oct 2014 #87
spoken like a man. whereas, I can totally relate to the Ginsberg imagery. The point is Spot On. Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #59
Is the Ginsburg imagery necessary? Renew Deal Oct 2014 #45
Agree. It worked, zentrum Oct 2014 #48
no. It is Dead On. Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #68
I Must Be Missing RobinA Oct 2014 #98
It's almost accurate. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #47
No n/t GP6971 Oct 2014 #51
No. Go farther, Danziger. Do it. Go There. K&R Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #56
it depends what the lynching part is about Enrique Oct 2014 #57
It might be a reference to Thomas' Senate hearings n2doc Oct 2014 #60
as a woman, I see it as a metaphor for silencing the woman's voice and I think it is powerfully done Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #62
did something happen? Enrique Oct 2014 #64
The Hobby Lobby Decision ... anyone ... Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #67
During the Senate's hearing of the nomination of Clarence Thomas as a candidate justice to the US Cal33 Oct 2014 #82
She is a very strong advocate of voting rights LeftInTX Oct 2014 #120
No. byronius Oct 2014 #58
Not at all. The toon is a masterpiece of restraint. Glorfindel Oct 2014 #61
NO. JEB Oct 2014 #65
Well I guess they can't all be Lukovich (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #66
This is on point and target! Thanks nt WhiteTara Oct 2014 #69
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #70
Hardly. I'd say it doesn't go far enough... gregcrawford Oct 2014 #71
welcome to DU, and your description is spot on irisblue Oct 2014 #80
No, nay, never. hifiguy Oct 2014 #72
Justice Ginsberg hanging from a tree? Yes, that goes too far. malthaussen Oct 2014 #73
Hell no! get the red out Oct 2014 #75
No......hell No... n/t prairierose Oct 2014 #77
Uhh, no Iwillnevergiveup Oct 2014 #78
No, but I must correct Roberts rock Oct 2014 #79
It's more than "not knowing what democracy means," Republicans are out to destroy democracy, Cal33 Oct 2014 #89
Not far enough. hedgehog Oct 2014 #81
NO Tommymac Oct 2014 #84
Cartoon is fine. Next forge for the 5 Royalist; remove the right to vote for women starting in DhhD Oct 2014 #85
Only republican cartoons can go too far. n/t hughee99 Oct 2014 #86
No. nt arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #88
Nope. calimary Oct 2014 #90
Does Danziger go too far with this toon? The CCC Oct 2014 #91
no, no, no heaven05 Oct 2014 #93
Who'd have thought madamesilverspurs Oct 2014 #94
No. Drawing is also speech. aquart Oct 2014 #95
Yes, but drawing isn't money, and SCOTUS has ruled only money is speech. valerief Oct 2014 #102
Not far enough, robes should be white with hoods. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #97
NO demigoddess Oct 2014 #99
Not at all. n/t Duval Oct 2014 #100
Not a whit. You can't go too far with these assholes. nt valerief Oct 2014 #101
Yes, but that's the point. nt MADem Oct 2014 #105
The Ginsburg lynching part pushes it tclambert Oct 2014 #106
Hell no.... daleanime Oct 2014 #107
oh, my. librechik Oct 2014 #108
No Not a Fan Oct 2014 #109
that's my attitude Enrique Oct 2014 #122
did he go to far ? padruig Oct 2014 #110
Nope. raven mad Oct 2014 #111
Yes, but to most here its celebrated. 7962 Oct 2014 #112
It's all in the context... IthinkThereforeIAM Oct 2014 #124
Nope! Sparhawk60 Oct 2014 #113
No rhett o rick Oct 2014 #114
Danziger often dips his pen in acid Warpy Oct 2014 #115
no Skittles Oct 2014 #116
No GeoWilliam750 Oct 2014 #117
no. eom Dollysmom Oct 2014 #118
Not in my book. Hekate Oct 2014 #119
No. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #121
No... IthinkThereforeIAM Oct 2014 #123
That would be no. blackspade Oct 2014 #125
No and so much more could have added to fully encapsulate the misfeasance and nonfeasance indepat Oct 2014 #126
Absolutely not nt jopacaco Oct 2014 #127
not far enough! niyad Oct 2014 #129
Absolutely not. LoisB Oct 2014 #132
NO! WestCoasterDude Oct 2014 #134
No Way! colsohlibgal Oct 2014 #135
No! joshdawg Oct 2014 #136
NO! nt LiberalElite Oct 2014 #137
Scalia Thespian2 Oct 2014 #138
nope. and I would say, not far enough. nt Javaman Oct 2014 #139
You mean because he made Scalia and Thomas out to be sex symbols as 20score Oct 2014 #140
Spot on shenmue Oct 2014 #141
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Danziger go too far ...»Reply #40