Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Danziger go too far ...»Reply #104
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Does Danziger go too far with this toon? [View all]

calimary

(89,951 posts)
104. Wouldn't that just beat all?
Reply to mountain grammy (Reply #96)
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 01:34 PM
Oct 2014

I would LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE to see that!!! The sheer beauty of being able to stick it to his enemies - a LIFETIME position on the Supreme Court! All that is, of course, ASIDE from the positive-oriented benefits (being able to stick it to his enemies would be a negative-oriented benefit) of his being a Constitutional scholar and an attorney, as well as a legislator at both the state AND federal level, I think he would be EMINENTLY qualified to join the highest bench in the land. It'd mean he'd have an impact on public policy LONG after he's left the White House, especially anticipating all the efforts being launched in the future to nullify everything and anything he's accomplished.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

142 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does Danziger go too far with this toon? [View all] n2doc Oct 2014 OP
no madokie Oct 2014 #1
No (nt) bigwillq Oct 2014 #2
No n/t PeoViejo Oct 2014 #3
Not far enough nt COLGATE4 Oct 2014 #4
I agree ablamj Oct 2014 #128
^^THIS^^ n/t 2naSalit Oct 2014 #131
Truth hurts. Lochloosa Oct 2014 #5
Nope. Scuba Oct 2014 #6
Well, he WAS a little too nice to ... 99Forever Oct 2014 #7
If only homegirl Oct 2014 #83
Welcome to DU, homegirl! calimary Oct 2014 #92
I like the way you think. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #96
Wouldn't that just beat all? calimary Oct 2014 #104
^^^^+1000 nt hopemountain Oct 2014 #130
++++ gringo43 Oct 2014 #142
Hell NO!! nt kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #8
No.....this is why elections matter...SCOTUS. nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #9
Yeah, the big fascist fuckers at the top. Cha Oct 2014 #22
Justice Alletto hair appears thicker. Half-Century Man Oct 2014 #10
There was no mention of Justice Alito in the cartoon, was there? Cal33 Oct 2014 #43
Ah, my bad. Half-Century Man Oct 2014 #46
I, too, got his name wrong the first time. Had to edit it. :) Cal33 Oct 2014 #50
No. nt TBF Oct 2014 #11
No. Has there been some controversy or do you think so? Is it the Ginsberg ref that gets it in trouble? lunasun Oct 2014 #12
The latter n/t n2doc Oct 2014 #13
He nails it malaise Oct 2014 #14
Great cartoon Gothmog Oct 2014 #15
Pushing it BuelahWitch Oct 2014 #16
There is an ick factor libodem Oct 2014 #23
Or could it be a case of "The Stockholm Syndrome?" Cal33 Oct 2014 #44
He's captured by something libodem Oct 2014 #49
Doubtful. hifiguy Oct 2014 #74
+1 bravenak Oct 2014 #103
I hate the term "self-loathing" Scootaloo Oct 2014 #133
Hell to the, No! libodem Oct 2014 #17
Absolutely Not n/t albino65 Oct 2014 #18
Sadly, no. Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #19
Clarence Thomas Pushes Past Ruth Bader Ginsberg In A Display Of Utter Disrespect jtuck004 Oct 2014 #20
Got to disagree about one thing... RoBear Oct 2014 #34
I think he would push her down a marble staircase if the opportunity presented itself to jtuck004 Oct 2014 #38
true. RoBear Oct 2014 #53
“Do what you feel in your heart to be right – for you’ll be criticized anyway. jtuck004 Oct 2014 #63
Nope n/t zeemike Oct 2014 #21
no...it is spot on noiretextatique Oct 2014 #24
mmmmmmmmmmmaaaayyyybe paulkienitz Oct 2014 #25
NO Plucketeer Oct 2014 #26
Not far enough. GoCubsGo Oct 2014 #27
Alito is in a corner moving his lips, hard to show in a cartoon. gordianot Oct 2014 #30
Where's Alito? world wide wally Oct 2014 #28
No. Danziger has balls! asjr Oct 2014 #29
No. The targets are completely deserving of such a depiction. Paladin Oct 2014 #31
No. Not at all Takket Oct 2014 #32
I can see where a couple of the pscot Oct 2014 #33
Yes Dirty Socialist Oct 2014 #35
ted cruz is a supreme? he has not gone too far, if it's true, and it is. eom ellenfl Oct 2014 #36
no spike91nz Oct 2014 #37
. libodem Oct 2014 #52
Danziger always nails it. sarge43 Oct 2014 #39
He's right on. proReality Oct 2014 #40
No. jwirr Oct 2014 #41
Yes. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #42
One interesting point is, Can any Republican get into any high position today without being a Cal33 Oct 2014 #54
Yes. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2014 #55
These days? No. hifiguy Oct 2014 #76
You're correct. The Neo-Cons joined the Republican Party some 40+ years ago, worked Cal33 Oct 2014 #87
spoken like a man. whereas, I can totally relate to the Ginsberg imagery. The point is Spot On. Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #59
Is the Ginsburg imagery necessary? Renew Deal Oct 2014 #45
Agree. It worked, zentrum Oct 2014 #48
no. It is Dead On. Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #68
I Must Be Missing RobinA Oct 2014 #98
It's almost accurate. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #47
No n/t GP6971 Oct 2014 #51
No. Go farther, Danziger. Do it. Go There. K&R Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #56
it depends what the lynching part is about Enrique Oct 2014 #57
It might be a reference to Thomas' Senate hearings n2doc Oct 2014 #60
as a woman, I see it as a metaphor for silencing the woman's voice and I think it is powerfully done Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #62
did something happen? Enrique Oct 2014 #64
The Hobby Lobby Decision ... anyone ... Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2014 #67
During the Senate's hearing of the nomination of Clarence Thomas as a candidate justice to the US Cal33 Oct 2014 #82
She is a very strong advocate of voting rights LeftInTX Oct 2014 #120
No. byronius Oct 2014 #58
Not at all. The toon is a masterpiece of restraint. Glorfindel Oct 2014 #61
NO. JEB Oct 2014 #65
Well I guess they can't all be Lukovich (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #66
This is on point and target! Thanks nt WhiteTara Oct 2014 #69
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #70
Hardly. I'd say it doesn't go far enough... gregcrawford Oct 2014 #71
welcome to DU, and your description is spot on irisblue Oct 2014 #80
No, nay, never. hifiguy Oct 2014 #72
Justice Ginsberg hanging from a tree? Yes, that goes too far. malthaussen Oct 2014 #73
Hell no! get the red out Oct 2014 #75
No......hell No... n/t prairierose Oct 2014 #77
Uhh, no Iwillnevergiveup Oct 2014 #78
No, but I must correct Roberts rock Oct 2014 #79
It's more than "not knowing what democracy means," Republicans are out to destroy democracy, Cal33 Oct 2014 #89
Not far enough. hedgehog Oct 2014 #81
NO Tommymac Oct 2014 #84
Cartoon is fine. Next forge for the 5 Royalist; remove the right to vote for women starting in DhhD Oct 2014 #85
Only republican cartoons can go too far. n/t hughee99 Oct 2014 #86
No. nt arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #88
Nope. calimary Oct 2014 #90
Does Danziger go too far with this toon? The CCC Oct 2014 #91
no, no, no heaven05 Oct 2014 #93
Who'd have thought madamesilverspurs Oct 2014 #94
No. Drawing is also speech. aquart Oct 2014 #95
Yes, but drawing isn't money, and SCOTUS has ruled only money is speech. valerief Oct 2014 #102
Not far enough, robes should be white with hoods. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #97
NO demigoddess Oct 2014 #99
Not at all. n/t Duval Oct 2014 #100
Not a whit. You can't go too far with these assholes. nt valerief Oct 2014 #101
Yes, but that's the point. nt MADem Oct 2014 #105
The Ginsburg lynching part pushes it tclambert Oct 2014 #106
Hell no.... daleanime Oct 2014 #107
oh, my. librechik Oct 2014 #108
No Not a Fan Oct 2014 #109
that's my attitude Enrique Oct 2014 #122
did he go to far ? padruig Oct 2014 #110
Nope. raven mad Oct 2014 #111
Yes, but to most here its celebrated. 7962 Oct 2014 #112
It's all in the context... IthinkThereforeIAM Oct 2014 #124
Nope! Sparhawk60 Oct 2014 #113
No rhett o rick Oct 2014 #114
Danziger often dips his pen in acid Warpy Oct 2014 #115
no Skittles Oct 2014 #116
No GeoWilliam750 Oct 2014 #117
no. eom Dollysmom Oct 2014 #118
Not in my book. Hekate Oct 2014 #119
No. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #121
No... IthinkThereforeIAM Oct 2014 #123
That would be no. blackspade Oct 2014 #125
No and so much more could have added to fully encapsulate the misfeasance and nonfeasance indepat Oct 2014 #126
Absolutely not nt jopacaco Oct 2014 #127
not far enough! niyad Oct 2014 #129
Absolutely not. LoisB Oct 2014 #132
NO! WestCoasterDude Oct 2014 #134
No Way! colsohlibgal Oct 2014 #135
No! joshdawg Oct 2014 #136
NO! nt LiberalElite Oct 2014 #137
Scalia Thespian2 Oct 2014 #138
nope. and I would say, not far enough. nt Javaman Oct 2014 #139
You mean because he made Scalia and Thomas out to be sex symbols as 20score Oct 2014 #140
Spot on shenmue Oct 2014 #141
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Danziger go too far ...»Reply #104
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.