Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 03:29 PM Oct 2014

"Your house destroyed our privacy" - this is what McMansionization looks like in LA [View all]

Click on the links to see new big houses dwarfing smaller ones

http://www.trbimg.com/img-5446f25d/turbine/la-1999481-me-adv-mansionization-furor-03-fo-jpg-20141021/950/950x534
Pam Roberts-Malay shows the signs she posted in her windows after the house next door was replaced with one roughly twice the size as the old one, marring her views of Century City. "Your house destroyed our privacy," one sign says. (Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times)

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-mansionization-20140505-story.html#page=1&lightbox=80103727
"None of us are opposed to expansion and development -- when it's respectful of the neighborhood," Traci Considine says, showing a "before" photo of a home under construction in Faircrest Heights that she believes demonstrates "mansionization." (Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)

http://www.trbimg.com/img-5366e68a/turbine/la-1798545-me-0314-mansionization-5-als-jpg-20140504/750/750x422
Kathleen Clark, left, and Beth Marlis look from their backyard at a two-story house under construction in Faircrest Heights. Clark and Marlis brought in mature trees to try to preserve their privacy. (Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)

Return of 'mansionization' has some L.A. homeowners grumbling

------------------

Builders are snapping up smaller, older homes, razing them and replacing them with bigger dwellings. Increasingly, sleek, square structures are popping up along streets known for quaint bungalows.

------------

But neighborhood groups have begun mobilizing, asserting that rules meant to control building sizes are still too porous. Critics argue that builders have exploited loopholes — bonuses that allow extra square footage — to erect homes too large for their lots. The recent surge of complaints prompted Michael LoGrande, director of the Department of City Planning, to tell lawmakers that more stringent controls might be needed.

In Hollywood, for example, members of a neighborhood group objected to a spec home exceeding 3,000 square feet, being built on a Stanley Avenue block lined with older, smaller homes — most of them under 2,000 square feet. Aggravated by the "out of place, enormous" residence, Amy Aquino of the Sunset Square Neighborhood Assn. said the group hired a land-use consultant to examine how it was allowed.

"Everything they were doing, hideous as it is, is all completely legal," Aquino said.

The builder behind the home, Amnon Edri, said that as long as his project meets requirements, it shouldn't be a problem.

"If the city code allows it, and you want a bigger house, you have the right to a bigger house," he said. "This is America. It's a free country."
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agree and have no sympathy for those who build/buy Dawson Leery Oct 2014 #1
A lot of this is driven by Chinese government policy AngryAmish Oct 2014 #18
True yeoman6987 Oct 2014 #28
I would be so upset if someone JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #2
They probably wouldn't scream as loudly Warpy Oct 2014 #5
This I agree with 100% JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #17
there needs to be community design standards -- the two houses next-door is perfect example nashville_brook Oct 2014 #3
If I observe all building codes and zoning restrictions... meaculpa2011 Oct 2014 #4
You contradict yourself in your own post BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #21
????????!!!!!!!!!!! My property rights end... meaculpa2011 Oct 2014 #24
Gotta say, I agree with you. Marr Oct 2014 #27
They should have to buy the whole block Politicalboi Oct 2014 #6
ahhhh, back for the old days when we thought at Levittown was the worst thing we thought developers MisterP Oct 2014 #7
A neighborhood I drive through often kiva Oct 2014 #8
An ongoing LA problem. I looked up this article from 1993 about Jack Lemmon and others Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #9
I used to appraise in L.A. This is SMALL potatoes. I remember rounding a curve Hortensis Oct 2014 #10
This should be the answer to stop this BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #22
Communities can enact protective laws, and some do. BrotherIvan, we used to live in Glendale, a Hortensis Oct 2014 #25
Excellent BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #30
Problems of rich people in a first world country. n/t dilby Oct 2014 #11
Well, not necessarily rich people - lots of people put all their equity into their home hedgehog Oct 2014 #13
I live near the bottom of the mountain, used to be surrounded by woods.. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #12
Everyone wants to live in the country - as long as they can bring Suburbia along with them! hedgehog Oct 2014 #14
Already happened. TPTB dislike our old non conforming house mountain grammy Oct 2014 #16
The neighborhood in Century city has houses you'd want to buy Johonny Oct 2014 #15
"marring her views of Century City" frazzled Oct 2014 #19
This is where my respect for property rights clashes with the credo of "Don't be a dick". Throd Oct 2014 #20
My street, also. House burnt down; new one is a story higher than the neighbors'! I am across the WinkyDink Oct 2014 #23
In our town, they changed the zoning law to deal with this problem, hollysmom Oct 2014 #26
Paint the side facing the mcmansion with bizzare colors & designs.... Historic NY Oct 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Your house destroye...