Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Richly Deserves to Be Dumped [View all]Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)259. Why waste the bandwidth
posting this sorry, trollish excuse for a political analysis.
"As evidence of a failed Obama presidency accumulates..."--the author discredits himself in the first line. SG
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
289 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Barbara Ehrenreich wrote "Nickled and Dimed" great book @ about the working poor in America.
bettyellen
Dec 2011
#182
I bet the vast majority of DUers don't know that -- much less the average Democrat.
pnwmom
Dec 2011
#193
Perhaps hardly a prominent liberal in the major media circuit of talk shows...
MrMickeysMom
Dec 2011
#204
I have known who Barbara Ehrenreich is for years. Plenty of DUers have posted stuff from and about
Hissyspit
Dec 2011
#224
She is both prominent and widely known to liberals. As an important writer of our era.
bettyellen
Dec 2011
#260
The fact the convention and primaries are still scheduled says otherwise.
Ferret Annica
Dec 2011
#26
In other words, we're not supposed to exercise our democratic rights.
Fantastic Anarchist
Dec 2011
#177
No, I don't, I support competionion for the nomination within the Democratic party.
Ferret Annica
Dec 2011
#31
w/everything good he's done you pick one issue and say that's it im done with him
leftyohiolib
Dec 2011
#124
ok... lemme give you a glass filled with 95% pure water, and the remaining 5%
dorksied
Dec 2011
#145
in 2010 people tried to "give him pause" and we ended up with a house full of repubs
leftyohiolib
Dec 2011
#112
I don't think that giving him competition to maybe "give him pause" is wise. Like I asked a
gateley
Dec 2011
#146
Maybe you need to read some history. Primary opponents only weaken an incumbent
pnwmom
Dec 2011
#173
Probably too young to remember Ted Kennedy primarying Jimmy Carter.
Old and In the Way
Dec 2011
#185
You don't think there may be a reason for this "constant regurgitation" of Obama failings?
RC
Dec 2011
#34
"lot of us that recognize reality", just b/c you call your view reality doesnt make it so.
leftyohiolib
Dec 2011
#115
I didn't see it. Well, I'm clearly not the only DU'er who didn't read or see the article.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#9
You are correct, but it would be a choice people out there would take were it offered
Ferret Annica
Dec 2011
#50
yes he would have! He'd wave his magic progressive wand and they'd all vote for it! nt
Old and In the Way
Dec 2011
#187
So you're saying, again, that's it OK to hit a woman when she deserves it...nt
SidDithers
Dec 2011
#129
Guess what. You were on my DU2 ignore list for personal attacks and you're back on it here.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#139
I don't understand why a Harper supporter even has an opinion about our party
Dragonfli
Dec 2011
#164
And in 2016 you will get another establishment Democrat who will say pretty words...
rfranklin
Dec 2011
#27
And that is not because liberal policies are not favored by the majority of Americans...
rfranklin
Dec 2011
#46
When do you expect to elect 60 non-centrist, non-moderate progressive Democrats to the Senate?
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#66
I would rec this thread, but the OP threatens to ignore anybody who even SLIGTHLY disagrees
Romulox
Dec 2011
#40
Please feel free to disagree. I have no problem with that if you don't engage in personal attacks
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#69
sad to say, but the game is fixed, there will be no 'left thrust' candidate
stockholmer
Dec 2011
#123
There needs to be a real Progressive movement in America to push the Democratic Party to the left.
matmar
Dec 2011
#43
Agree in theory but some things you just cannot let stand unchallenged.
great white snark
Dec 2011
#53
This article was a piece of trash the first time it was posted. Did we really need to see it again?
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#59
There are any number of reasons why this is crap - but Dodd-Frank is the best one
bhikkhu
Dec 2011
#60
Yes, he does. And we all deserve human rights. But it's not a good time to seek either of them.
saras
Dec 2011
#72
You were on my DU3 ignore list for probably engaging in personal attacks rather than civil debate.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#190
Yep. The "Click to see who rec'd a thread button" was made for crap like this.
Number23
Dec 2011
#170
You were on my DU3 ignore list probably because you engaged in personal attacks against DU'ers.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#192
You put me on ignore because I caught you using "selective quotation" to spread disinformation
emulatorloo
Dec 2011
#225
AMERICA RICHLY DESERVES TO BE FUCKED AGAIN if we lissen to pricks like MacArthur....we gonna insert
opihimoimoi
Dec 2011
#84
I also hated Johnson for the same reason as you. And I foolishly believed Nixon when he said he
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#281
Good post but I believe that the strategy of Pres Obama is to shun the left and go for the
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#143
'viable' will be one of the words written someday in the obituary of Pax Americana
stockholmer
Dec 2011
#96
Ending the tyranny of the money-changers will be considerably less 'viable' ...
Martin Eden
Dec 2011
#105
I would never advocate for the Republicans, but to think that the Democrats as they currently are
stockholmer
Dec 2011
#113
I had no intent to insult anyone, and I'm sorry if my post was misconstrued
Martin Eden
Dec 2011
#287
at the end of the day, the US sham 2 party system forces you to accept tyranny, pick your flavour
stockholmer
Dec 2011
#92
empiric wars = force projection on a global platform to ensure Anglo/American banker hegemony
stockholmer
Dec 2011
#180
Wow, you read a lot into a few words. No, that is not what I am saying or suggesting.
uppityperson
Dec 2011
#278
You were on my ignore list on DU2 due to your personal attacks on DU'ers. You're back on it.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#138
This is just silly. Last week he was at 84% among Dems and his ratings are going up.
OregonBlue
Dec 2011
#128
That's a very powerful rebuttal to the article. Thanks for your insight and knowledge.
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#154
Do you think "John R. MacArthur can go fuck himself" is an effective and powerful rebuttal?
Better Believe It
Dec 2011
#214
The sad fact is that everything you said is valid. However, the republicans ARE much worse. There
still_one
Dec 2011
#208
"Failed" is one of the Republican campaign talking points. It's getting to where one can't tell...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2011
#191
Sure do wish unrec would come back. This stinks. I see Pres. Obama the best one in the race!
The Wielding Truth
Dec 2011
#207
This is not a "failed" administration; there should be no primary challenge.
SunSeeker
Dec 2011
#227
When will a real liberal or progressive get off his/her ass and do half as much as Obama or ...
BootinUp
Dec 2011
#236
Doesn't President Obama always tell us we should "hold his feet to the fire"?
Common Sense Party
Dec 2011
#241