" Of all the gin joints..." (Black box election fraud just happened to me.)

[Ms. Toad]

18. Vote buying is the reason you cannot be provided with a printed copy of your vote.

Permitting you to prove how you voted would allow you to sell your vote to the highest bidder.

You are aware that party names are not programmed into the software, right? They are entered locally, and there is no uniform set of party names that are used. So how did the voting machine programmers (who have no control over what parties you enter, or which order you enter then in) know which fields would be filled with republican/right candidates in order to always make the change in the "correct" direction?

Anecdotes posted here are going to be people who intended to vote for a left-leaning candidate, so any mis-calibration errors would be reported here as a "flip" to the right, and reading here would give you the impression that everything reported is a single direction shift. Do you have any unbiased, large, studies that support your assertion?

Hacking is certainly possible in any electronic system - but where you see large scale hacking is either in a central database (there is none here) or where the independent machines are linked together via a network. Neither of those situations exist with voting machines. What is being alleged here is massive control over hundreds of thousands of machines which are never linked together, which are infinitely customizable in terms of the data (party names, candidates, and positions), which has to be carried out by a very limited number of individuals in keep the exact details of the plot secret for all these years. That is just not realistic - and if you would like to prove it is, please provide the code outline I requested. So far, no one has been able to do that.