Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is no need to isolate for 21 days. Monitoring is sufficient [View all]morningfog
(18,115 posts)53. There is no chance when no symptoms. For fuck's sake.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is it too much to suggest avoiding public transportation for unnecessary trips,
Nye Bevan
Oct 2014
#4
It's my understanding that sweat is not full of virus until very late in the illness.
kestrel91316
Oct 2014
#64
People with known physical contact with either the victim or the fluids
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#6
Ebola Man, hours away from running a high fever and vomiting, coughs into his hand
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#8
I fully understand that the disease progresses and becomes more contagious as time goes on, but
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#11
And, of course, we will make sure we can catch them up at the exact moment
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2014
#40
The doctors who come back sick don't really know how or when they were infected.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#47
You make blanket statements and draw conclusions that I've never seen anywhere else.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#62
It isn't my opinion. Doctors and scientists who have studied have come to these conclusions.
morningfog
Oct 2014
#63
Anyone with Ebola and a fever can PROGRESS to vomiting and if they're in public,
pnwmom
Oct 2014
#67
Health officials request everyone who has been potentially exposed to ebola
boston bean
Oct 2014
#13
Your point is not in keeping with what Public Health Officials or the CDC are requesting.
boston bean
Oct 2014
#15
You need to go and understand what is meant by "potentially exposed" to means
boston bean
Oct 2014
#22
Some are, yes. Your comments here don't agree with epidemiologist's guidances or the evidence.
Yo_Mama
Oct 2014
#29
Spencer wasn't asymptomatic, which is why they are quarantining the direct contacts.
Yo_Mama
Oct 2014
#44
Not asking people who have been potentially exposed to ebola to self isolate voluntarily
boston bean
Oct 2014
#21
You are making unfounded declarations that are in stark contrast to what the health experts
boston bean
Oct 2014
#25
Uh, I think you need to calm down, thinking I'm not as calm and cool as a cucumber.
boston bean
Oct 2014
#34
I think the wedding planner group have until 11/7 to be sure. They had close contact.
Sunlei
Oct 2014
#45
No, it was not okay to force Duncan's family into isolation. That is my point.
morningfog
Oct 2014
#57
I get what you're trying to do, but there are only 5 beds in the entire United States
ecstatic
Oct 2014
#68