Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
13. Solar and wind
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 11:14 PM
Oct 2014

Too cheap to meter. Or tax, or create huge profits for wall street. That's why we don't get much electricity from solar and wind.

And Carol Browner could have lead the way when she was in office and we'd be cutting way back on greenhouse emissions today. Instead we have browner skies. Now she's brown-nosing nukes. What a waste.

She is no environmentalist. She's a hack, and nuclear power is the deadliest source of energy humans have ever produced. And it isn't just today's pollution, it's the fact that the nuke waste lasts for as long as a thousand years. In fifty years, once we have solar and wind power, all the excess co2 will be gone.

Long-lived radionuclides such as Cesium-137 are something new to us as a species. They did not exist on Earth in any appreciable quantities during the entire evolution of complex life. Co2 did. Although they are invisible to our senses they are millions of times more poisonous than most of the common poisons we are familiar with. They cause cancer, leukemia, genetic mutations, birth defects, malformations, and abortions at concentrations almost below human recognition and comprehension. They are lethal at the atomic or molecular level.

They emit radiation, invisible forms of matter and energy that we might compare to fire, because radiation burns and destroys human tissue. But unlike the fire of fossil fuels, the nuclear fire that issues forth from radioactive elements cannot be extinguished. It is not a fire that can be
scattered or suffocated because it burns at the atomic level—it comes from the disintegration of single atoms.

Fukushima has not only killed starfish but irradiated dolphins in the Atlantic. zappaman Oct 2014 #1
I'm a particular fan of the "warming up the pacific" theory FBaggins Oct 2014 #2
I agree with the EPA. zappaman Oct 2014 #3
Since you asked about moi RobertEarl Oct 2014 #14
Annnnd RobertEarl Oct 2014 #15
I know that you and reality had a messy divorce due to irreconcilable differences... FBaggins Oct 2014 #24
Eh? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #26
There's no "attack" there FBaggins Oct 2014 #27
You remind me of faux news RobertEarl Oct 2014 #29
Which, no doubt, you don't see as a personal attack. FBaggins Oct 2014 #30
There you go again RobertEarl Oct 2014 #31
There *I* go again? FBaggins Oct 2014 #32
That's all you got? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #33
Making up stories? FBaggins Oct 2014 #34
Kris? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #36
I haven't seen him in months FBaggins Oct 2014 #37
Point is RobertEarl Oct 2014 #38
Of course... that too is incorrect. FBaggins Oct 2014 #39
That is just your opinion RobertEarl Oct 2014 #40
You have a long habit of mistaking facts for opinion... FBaggins Oct 2014 #42
Thanks for the link. zappaman Oct 2014 #41
And you still think that's somehow connected to demon cores at Fukushima, right? FBaggins Oct 2014 #25
Getting rid of all the nuclear waste in the cooling pools stored at the reactors should be first. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #4
Waste disposal is actually pretty easy FBaggins Oct 2014 #5
I didn't know you could recycle spent fule dlwickham Oct 2014 #6
Yep. You absolutely can. FBaggins Oct 2014 #7
That's one of the stupidest things I've ever read. bananas Oct 2014 #12
Breeder reactors? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #19
I didn't realize that you were so poorly read. FBaggins Oct 2014 #20
You can't recycle it, it's a PR term for reprocessing. bananas Oct 2014 #9
don't you lose some of the original aluminum in the process dlwickham Oct 2014 #16
Don't buy the spin FBaggins Oct 2014 #21
She's wrong, and Nuclear Matters is an astroturf group bananas Oct 2014 #8
NIRS is less credible. FBaggins Oct 2014 #11
Much better than coal. nt ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #10
Solar and wind RobertEarl Oct 2014 #13
Until solar and wind can generate on-demand 24/7 we need something else Lee-Lee Oct 2014 #17
Nuclear is the most expensive RobertEarl Oct 2014 #18
All evidence to the contrary FBaggins Oct 2014 #22
Obama and Exelon - TBF Oct 2014 #23
Not sure how we are going to solve our problems here. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #28
Good point RobertEarl Oct 2014 #35
Fukushima is a joke when compared to coal. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former EPA leader: ‘Irres...»Reply #13