Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
14. Since you asked about moi
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 11:30 PM
Oct 2014

Gov’t Scientists: “Something very unusual occurring” off west coast of US, Canada — “Unprecedented in historical record” — “Will dramatically reduce productivity” in 6,500 sq. miles of ocean — Anomaly extends “across Pacific to Japan” — “Who knows what will happen?” (MAP)

Fishletter Issue 335, July 24, 2014 (emphasis added): There is a massive pool of warm water in the Gulf of Alaska, NOAA scientist Nate Mantua said in an email. It is unprecedented in the historical record, he added… the past year is way out of the historical range — “so who knows what will happen?“

NOAA Fisheries, Sept. 2014: Scientists across NOAA Fisheries are watching a persistent expanse of exceptionally warm water spanning the Gulf of Alaska that could send reverberations through the marine food web. The warm expanse appeared about a year ago and the longer it lingers, the greater potential it has to affect ocean life… “Right now it’s super warm all the way across the Pacific to Japan,” said Bill Peterson, an oceanographer with NOAA… “it’s a very interesting time because when you see something like this that’s totally new you have opportunities to learn things you were never expecting.” Not since records began has the region of the North Pacific Ocean been so warm for so long… The situation does not match recognized patterns in ocean conditions such as El Niño Southern Oscillation or Pacific Decadal Oscillation… “It’s a strange and mixed bag out there,” Mantua said… warm temperatures are higher and cover more of the northern Pacific than the PDO typically affects… cold near-shore conditions in the Pacific Northwest also don’t match the typical PDO pattern.

North Pacific Marine Science Organization (pdf), Summer 2014: In March 2014 there was something very unusual occurring in the Northeast (NE) Pacific that might have substantial consequences for biota in the Gulf of Alaska and southward into the subtropics… we see SST departures of 4.5 standard deviations… The anomaly field covers a large region of the N.E. Pacific… The authors of this article have never seen deviations… Something as extraordinary as a 4.5-sigma deviation requires corroboration… Argo data verify the very large temperature departures… and similar large deviations in salinity… the event is primarily restricted to the upper 100 metres of the water… In most years, a winter region of high productivity is created by this Ekman transport… Without nutrients from the subarctic, the productivity of subtropical waters must decline… Between 30–40°N, surface chlorophyll dropped to 60% of the average values… weakened nutrient transport from the subarctic into the subtropics this past winter will dramatically reduce the productivity of the eastern subtropics over an area of ~17,000 km² .

Fukushima has not only killed starfish but irradiated dolphins in the Atlantic. zappaman Oct 2014 #1
I'm a particular fan of the "warming up the pacific" theory FBaggins Oct 2014 #2
I agree with the EPA. zappaman Oct 2014 #3
Since you asked about moi RobertEarl Oct 2014 #14
Annnnd RobertEarl Oct 2014 #15
I know that you and reality had a messy divorce due to irreconcilable differences... FBaggins Oct 2014 #24
Eh? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #26
There's no "attack" there FBaggins Oct 2014 #27
You remind me of faux news RobertEarl Oct 2014 #29
Which, no doubt, you don't see as a personal attack. FBaggins Oct 2014 #30
There you go again RobertEarl Oct 2014 #31
There *I* go again? FBaggins Oct 2014 #32
That's all you got? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #33
Making up stories? FBaggins Oct 2014 #34
Kris? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #36
I haven't seen him in months FBaggins Oct 2014 #37
Point is RobertEarl Oct 2014 #38
Of course... that too is incorrect. FBaggins Oct 2014 #39
That is just your opinion RobertEarl Oct 2014 #40
You have a long habit of mistaking facts for opinion... FBaggins Oct 2014 #42
Thanks for the link. zappaman Oct 2014 #41
And you still think that's somehow connected to demon cores at Fukushima, right? FBaggins Oct 2014 #25
Getting rid of all the nuclear waste in the cooling pools stored at the reactors should be first. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #4
Waste disposal is actually pretty easy FBaggins Oct 2014 #5
I didn't know you could recycle spent fule dlwickham Oct 2014 #6
Yep. You absolutely can. FBaggins Oct 2014 #7
That's one of the stupidest things I've ever read. bananas Oct 2014 #12
Breeder reactors? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #19
I didn't realize that you were so poorly read. FBaggins Oct 2014 #20
You can't recycle it, it's a PR term for reprocessing. bananas Oct 2014 #9
don't you lose some of the original aluminum in the process dlwickham Oct 2014 #16
Don't buy the spin FBaggins Oct 2014 #21
She's wrong, and Nuclear Matters is an astroturf group bananas Oct 2014 #8
NIRS is less credible. FBaggins Oct 2014 #11
Much better than coal. nt ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #10
Solar and wind RobertEarl Oct 2014 #13
Until solar and wind can generate on-demand 24/7 we need something else Lee-Lee Oct 2014 #17
Nuclear is the most expensive RobertEarl Oct 2014 #18
All evidence to the contrary FBaggins Oct 2014 #22
Obama and Exelon - TBF Oct 2014 #23
Not sure how we are going to solve our problems here. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #28
Good point RobertEarl Oct 2014 #35
Fukushima is a joke when compared to coal. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former EPA leader: ‘Irres...»Reply #14